feat: harper-cli normalize-dictionary
#1892
Conversation
harper-cli/src/main.rs
Outdated
| // result.extend(pos_map.get(pos_flag_char).unwrap()); | ||
| // let props = pos_map.get(pos_flag_char).unwrap(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Commented code means it was a left behind debug, or some idea that was tried and is unresolved for now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Commented code means it was a left behind debug, or some idea that was tried and is unresolved for now
This is still a draft. I should've put "work in progress" in the description.
harper-cli/src/main.rs
Outdated
| let pos_tags = "NOVJRIPCD"; | ||
| let noun_props = "09gmw"; | ||
| let verb_props = "lAbdGtT6h"; | ||
| let pron_props = "aso123F"; | ||
| let adj_props = "^cuY*.:"; | ||
| let det_props = "qM5"; | ||
| let noun_and_verb_props = "S"; | ||
| let verb_and_adj_props = ">"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So it means you have to maintain annotations.json and this at the same time?
I might be wrong, but if not, I'm a bit worried.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So it means you have to maintain annotations.json and this at the same time?
I might be wrong, but if not, I'm a bit worried.
I think I'll add fields to annotation.json to enable pulling these out programmatically. Still developing this feature...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a pre-AI-era image I made ages ago, and I cherish
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(-: Feedback is still cool.
…ctionary-normalize-and-audit
…tionary-normalize-and-audit
…tionary-normalize-and-audit
|
I can't find a way to get rid of all the merge commits from this PR, other than making a new clean PR. So #2133 replaces this PR. |
2 participants
Issues
N/A
Description
(Work in progress)
dictionary.dict.dictionary.dictandannotations.json.)How Has This Been Tested?
Manual testing
Checklist