Skip to content

Conversation

@markcowl
Copy link
Member

@markcowl markcowl commented Dec 5, 2025

No description provided.

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

azure-sdk commented Dec 5, 2025

All changed packages have been documented.

  • @azure-tools/typespec-autorest-canonical
  • @azure-tools/typespec-autorest
  • @azure-tools/typespec-azure-resource-manager
Show changes

@azure-tools/typespec-autorest-canonical - fix ✏️

Adapt to shared type changes in typespec-autorest

@azure-tools/typespec-autorest - feature ✏️

Add support for multiple output files in typespec-autorest

@azure-tools/typespec-azure-resource-manager - feature ✏️

Add support for multiple output files in typespec-autorest

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/Azure/typespec-azure/@azure-tools/typespec-autorest@3622
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/Azure/typespec-azure/@azure-tools/typespec-autorest-canonical@3622
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/Azure/typespec-azure/@azure-tools/typespec-azure-resource-manager@3622

commit: c2e2c2a

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

azure-sdk commented Dec 5, 2025

You can try these changes here

🛝 Playground 🌐 Website

@markcowl markcowl added the int:azure-specs Run integration tests against azure-rest-api-specs label Dec 5, 2025
@markcowl markcowl changed the base branch from main to release/december-2025 December 15, 2025 20:43
@markcowl markcowl force-pushed the autorest-multifile branch 3 times, most recently from d51ae8e to c3e8bcb Compare December 18, 2025 05:56
@markcowl markcowl changed the base branch from release/december-2025 to main December 21, 2025 08:38
@markcowl markcowl marked this pull request as ready for review December 21, 2025 09:12
@markcowl markcowl requested a review from bterlson as a code owner December 21, 2025 09:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

int:azure-specs Run integration tests against azure-rest-api-specs

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants