Skip to content

chore: add new feature flag SUPPORTS_ERC20 for chains that supports_erc20_token #6677

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rv-bitgo
Copy link
Contributor

@rv-bitgo rv-bitgo commented Aug 11, 2025

WIN-6598

TICKET: WIN-6598

Adding this flag for all chains that supports ERC20 tokens. This flag would be used to identify the coins that are supporting ERC20 tokens in BITGO system.

This PR is part of ERC20 automation EPIC and this flag's usage can be seen in this PR

@rv-bitgo rv-bitgo requested review from a team as code owners August 11, 2025 14:28
/**
* This coin supports erc20 tokens
*/
IS_ERC20_TOKEN = 'is-erc20-token',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we require this flag?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated the description

@rv-bitgo rv-bitgo marked this pull request as draft August 12, 2025 13:10
WIN-6598

TICKET: WIN-6598

feat: add new feature flag

TICKET: WIN-6598
@rv-bitgo rv-bitgo force-pushed the WIN-6598-new-feature-flag branch from c769809 to 4657b2a Compare August 13, 2025 12:18
@rv-bitgo rv-bitgo changed the title chore: add new feature flag for is_erc20_token chore: add new feature flag for supports_erc20_token Aug 13, 2025
@rv-bitgo rv-bitgo changed the title chore: add new feature flag for supports_erc20_token chore: add new feature flag SUPPORTS_ERC20 for chains that supports_erc20_token Aug 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants