Skip to content

Conversation

@kevross33
Copy link
Contributor

@kevross33 kevross33 commented Dec 29, 2025

So this needs testing please as I don't have a current CAPE until i am back in office/have new home lab PC in a few weeks.

The logic of this is that the Windows loader should take care of NTDLL. Loading a fresh NTDLL into itself from disk likely is then to begin parsing it for syscall instruction for doing that or to bypass hooking.

Here are two samples that do this for testing each element:

  1. AgentTesla https://capesandbox.com/analysis/46120/

This uses NTCreateFile on ntdll to load it and then NtReadFile to read it into memory.

  1. LUMMA https://capesandbox.com/analysis/46359/

This uses NTCreateFile on ntdll to load it then maps in into its memory with NTCreateSection before changing the memory protections on it (likely to then patch it and remove hooks).

There is another possible indirect syscall detection where ntdll is in memory where it starts parsing that for the sycall bytes. If I can find a sample doing that I will try and work out how to sig it if possible.

So this needs testing please as I don't have a current CAPE until i am back in office/have new home lab PC in a few weeks. 

The logic of this is that the Windows loader should take care of NTDLL. Loading a fresh NTDLL into itself from disk likely is then to begin parsing it for syscall instruction for doing that or to bypass hooking.

Here are two samples that do this for testing each element: 

1) AgentTesla https://capesandbox.com/analysis/46120/ 

This uses NTCreateFile on ntdll to load it and then NtReadFile to read it into memory.

2) LUMMA https://capesandbox.com/analysis/46359/

This uses NTCreateFile on ntdll to load it then maps in into its memory with NTCreateSection before changing the memory protections on it (likely to then patch it and remove hooks).
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @kevross33, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new Cuckoo signature designed to detect sophisticated malware techniques that involve loading a fresh copy of ntdll.dll from disk. This behavior is often a precursor to syscall unhooking or anti-EDR bypass, where malware attempts to remove security product hooks by replacing the in-memory ntdll.dll with an untampered version. The signature aims to enhance detection capabilities against such evasion tactics by monitoring specific file and memory manipulation API calls related to ntdll.dll.

Highlights

  • New Signature Added: Introduced a new Cuckoo signature named Suspicious_NTDLL_DiskLoad to detect advanced anti-EDR and syscall unhooking techniques.
  • Detection Logic: The signature identifies suspicious activity where ntdll.dll is loaded from disk, mapped into memory, and its memory protections are altered (e.g., to PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE).
  • Monitored APIs: It monitors key Windows API calls including NtCreateFile, NtCreateSection, NtOpenFile, NtProtectVirtualMemory, and NtReadFile to track the lifecycle of ntdll.dll manipulation.
  • MITRE ATT&CK Mapping: The signature is mapped to MITRE ATT&CK TTP T1106 (Native API) for better threat intelligence correlation.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new Cuckoo signature to detect malware that loads a fresh copy of ntdll.dll from disk to bypass EDR hooks. The logic correctly identifies two common patterns involving NtReadFile and NtCreateSection/NtProtectVirtualMemory. However, the implementation contains several critical bugs, including syntax errors, incorrect use of operators, and unsafe handling of API arguments, which would prevent the signature from working correctly. I've provided detailed comments and suggestions to fix these issues.

kevross33 and others added 6 commits December 29, 2025 13:04
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants