Skip to content

Apply consistent UType field descriptions #434

Description

@nils-work

As noted in the MI20 Holistic issue, all UType field descriptions could follow a standardised format for consistency and improved interpretation.

Apply the change noted in the MI20 holistic feedback issue:

The "Reference to the applicable [type] structure." convention could be applied to all ...UType field descriptions for consistency and clarity of interpretation.

The following sample shows the current variation across schemas:

  • The type of recurrence used to define the schedule.
  • The type of structure to present account specific fields.
  • Indicator of the type of transaction object present in this record
  • The type of address object present
  • The type of object present in this response (from EnergyPaymentSchedule)
  • Type of object included that describes the payee in detail.
  • The type of customer object that is present
  • Type of account object included.

This style was applied to the field noted here.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions