Skip to content

[🤖] Update Latest Dependency#5561

Open
dd-octo-sts[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
auto-generate/update-latest-dependencies
Open

[🤖] Update Latest Dependency#5561
dd-octo-sts[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
auto-generate/update-latest-dependencies

Conversation

@dd-octo-sts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot commented Apr 5, 2026

This is an auto-generated PR from here, which creates a pull request that will be continually updated with new changes until it is merged or closed)

The PR updates latest versions of defined dependencies. Please review the changes and merge when ready.

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot added dev/internal Other internal work that does not need to be included in the changelog integrations Involves tracing integrations labels Apr 5, 2026
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot requested a review from a team as a code owner April 5, 2026 00:38
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Apr 5, 2026

👋 Hey @DataDog/ruby-guild, please fill "Change log entry" section in the pull request description.

If changes need to be present in CHANGELOG.md you can state it this way

**Change log entry**

Yes. A brief summary to be placed into the CHANGELOG.md

(possible answers Yes/Yep/Yeah)

Or you can opt out like that

**Change log entry**

None.

(possible answers No/Nope/None)

Visited at: 2026-04-05 00:38:39 UTC

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2
Copy link
Copy Markdown

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 bot commented Apr 5, 2026

✅ Tests

🎉 All green!

❄️ No new flaky tests detected
🧪 All tests passed

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 71a0d53 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Was this helpful? React with 👍/👎 or give us feedback!

@pr-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

pr-commenter bot commented Apr 5, 2026

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-04-08 14:32:08

Comparing candidate commit 71a0d53 in PR branch auto-generate/update-latest-dependencies with baseline commit 15b2cef in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 45 metrics, 1 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

@vpellan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vpellan commented Apr 10, 2026

We need to wait for Rack 3.2.7 to be released or disable rack latest for ruby 2.5 (rack/rack#2443)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dev/internal Other internal work that does not need to be included in the changelog integrations Involves tracing integrations

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant