Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backtracking traverser #126

Draft
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Backtracking traverser #126

wants to merge 14 commits into from

Conversation

Anilm3
Copy link
Collaborator

@Anilm3 Anilm3 commented Dec 19, 2022

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 19, 2022

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 13 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.02%. Comparing base (7d593c5) to head (33bd8f2).

Files Patch % Lines
src/exclusion/object_filter.hpp 75.00% 4 Missing and 9 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #126      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.09%   83.02%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         115      115              
  Lines        4566     4577      +11     
  Branches     2143     2146       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         3794     3800       +6     
- Misses        300      303       +3     
- Partials      472      474       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
waf_test 83.02% <75.00%> (-0.07%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Mar 13, 2024

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2024-03-13 11:53:55

Comparing candidate commit 33bd8f2 in PR branch anilm3/backtracking-traverser with baseline commit 7d593c5 in branch master.

Found 4 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 14 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

scenario:is_xss_matcher.random

  • 🟩 execution_time [-5.713ms; -5.707ms] or [-7.851%; -7.842%]

scenario:regex_match_matcher.case_insensitive_flag.random

  • 🟩 execution_time [-581.729µs; -580.130µs] or [-11.937%; -11.905%]

scenario:regex_match_matcher.case_insensitive_option.random

  • 🟩 execution_time [-596.172µs; -594.263µs] or [-12.242%; -12.203%]

scenario:regex_match_matcher.lowercase_transformer.random

  • 🟩 execution_time [-520.942µs; -519.193µs] or [-8.286%; -8.258%]

scenario:regex_match_matcher.random

  • 🟥 execution_time [+105.140µs; +106.189µs] or [+5.466%; +5.520%]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants