Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency p-wait-for to v5 #56

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 25, 2022

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
p-wait-for ^3.1.0 -> ^5.0.2 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

sindresorhus/p-wait-for (p-wait-for)

v5.0.2

Compare Source

v5.0.1

Compare Source

  • Fix types to support returning boolean and resolveWith() in the same callback (#​29) fee93a5

v5.0.0

Compare Source

Breaking
Improvements

v4.1.0

Compare Source

  • Export TimeoutError for instance checking 3201c2c

v4.0.0

Compare Source

Breaking

v3.2.0

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/p-wait-for-5.x branch from 1227227 to 843e32d Compare March 16, 2023 15:35
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/p-wait-for-5.x branch from 843e32d to ee01694 Compare March 30, 2023 05:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants