Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency pytest-asyncio to ^0.24.0 #156

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Aug 27, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
pytest-asyncio (changelog) ^0.21.0 -> ^0.24.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

pytest-dev/pytest-asyncio (pytest-asyncio)

v0.24.0: pytest-asyncio 0.24.0

Compare Source

0.24.0 (2024-08-22)
  • BREAKING: Updated minimum supported pytest version to v8.2.0
  • Adds an optional loop_scope keyword argument to pytest.mark.asyncio. This argument controls which event loop is used to run the marked async test. #​706, #​871
  • Deprecates the optional scope keyword argument to pytest.mark.asyncio for API consistency with pytest_asyncio.fixture. Users are encouraged to use the loop_scope keyword argument, which does exactly the same.
  • Raises an error when passing scope or loop_scope as a positional argument to @pytest.mark.asyncio. #​812
  • Fixes a bug that caused module-scoped async fixtures to fail when reused in other modules #​862 #​668

v0.23.8: pytest-asyncio 0.23.8

Compare Source

0.23.8 (2024-07-17)

  • Fixes a bug that caused duplicate markers in async tests #​813

Known issues

As of v0.23, pytest-asyncio attaches an asyncio event loop to each item of the test suite (i.e. session, packages, modules, classes, functions) and allows tests to be run in those loops when marked accordingly. Pytest-asyncio currently assumes that async fixture scope is correlated with the new event loop scope. This prevents fixtures from being evaluated independently from the event loop scope and breaks some existing test suites (see #​706). For example, a test suite may require all fixtures and tests to run in the same event loop, but have async fixtures that are set up and torn down for each module. If you're affected by this issue, please continue using the v0.21 release, until it is resolved.

v0.23.7: pytest-asyncio 0.23.7

Compare Source

0.23.7 (2024-05-19)
  • Silence deprecation warnings about unclosed event loops that occurred with certain CPython patch releases #​817
Known issues

As of v0.23, pytest-asyncio attaches an asyncio event loop to each item of the test suite (i.e. session, packages, modules, classes, functions) and allows tests to be run in those loops when marked accordingly. Pytest-asyncio currently assumes that async fixture scope is correlated with the new event loop scope. This prevents fixtures from being evaluated independently from the event loop scope and breaks some existing test suites (see #​706). For example, a test suite may require all fixtures and tests to run in the same event loop, but have async fixtures that are set up and torn down for each module. If you're affected by this issue, please continue using the v0.21 release, until it is resolved.

v0.23.6: pytest-asyncio 0.23.6

Compare Source

0.23.6 (2024-03-19)
  • Fix compatibility with pytest 8.2 #​800
Known issues

As of v0.23, pytest-asyncio attaches an asyncio event loop to each item of the test suite (i.e. session, packages, modules, classes, functions) and allows tests to be run in those loops when marked accordingly. Pytest-asyncio currently assumes that async fixture scope is correlated with the new event loop scope. This prevents fixtures from being evaluated independently from the event loop scope and breaks some existing test suites (see #​706). For example, a test suite may require all fixtures and tests to run in the same event loop, but have async fixtures that are set up and torn down for each module. If you're affected by this issue, please continue using the v0.21 release, until it is resolved.

v0.23.5: pytest-asyncio 0.23.5

Compare Source

0.23.5 (2024-02-09)
  • Declare compatibility with pytest 8 #​737
  • Fix typing errors with recent versions of mypy #​769
  • Prevent DeprecationWarning about internal use of asyncio.get_event_loop() from affecting test cases #​757
Known issues

As of v0.23, pytest-asyncio attaches an asyncio event loop to each item of the test suite (i.e. session, packages, modules, classes, functions) and allows tests to be run in those loops when marked accordingly. Pytest-asyncio currently assumes that async fixture scope is correlated with the new event loop scope. This prevents fixtures from being evaluated independently from the event loop scope and breaks some existing test suites (see #​706). For example, a test suite may require all fixtures and tests to run in the same event loop, but have async fixtures that are set up and torn down for each module. If you're affected by this issue, please continue using the v0.21 release, until it is resolved.

v0.23.4: pytest-asyncio 0.23.4

Compare Source

0.23.4 (2024-01-28)
  • pytest-asyncio no longer imports additional, unrelated packages during test collection #​729
  • Addresses further issues that caused an internal pytest error during test collection
  • Declares incompatibility with pytest 8 #​737

v0.23.3: pytest-asyncio 0.23.3

Compare Source

0.23.3 (2024-01-01)
  • Fixes a bug that caused event loops to be closed prematurely when using async generator fixtures with class scope or wider in a function-scoped test #​706
  • Fixes various bugs that caused an internal pytest error during test collection #​711 #​713 #​719
Known issues

As of v0.23, pytest-asyncio attaches an asyncio event loop to each item of the test suite (i.e. session, packages, modules, classes, functions) and allows tests to be run in those loops when marked accordingly. Pytest-asyncio currently assumes that async fixture scope is correlated with the new event loop scope. This prevents fixtures from being evaluated independently from the event loop scope and breaks some existing test suites (see #​706). For example, a test suite may require all fixtures and tests to run in the same event loop, but have async fixtures that are set up and torn down for each module. If you're affected by this issue, please continue using the v0.21 release, until it is resolved.

v0.23.2: pytest-asyncio 0.23.2

Compare Source

0.23.2 (2023-12-04)
  • Fixes a bug that caused an internal pytest error when collecting .txt files #​703

v0.23.1: pytest-asyncio 0.23.1

Compare Source

0.23.1 (2023-12-03)
  • Fixes a bug that caused an internal pytest error when using module-level skips #​701

v0.23.0: pytest-asyncio 0.23.0

Compare Source

This release is backwards-compatible with v0.21. Changes are
non-breaking, unless you upgrade from v0.22.

  • BREAKING: The asyncio_event_loop mark has been removed. Event
    loops with class, module, package, and session scopes can be
    requested via the scope keyword argument to the asyncio
    mark.
  • Introduces the event_loop_policy fixture which allows testing with
    non-default or multiple event loops #​662
  • Introduces pytest_asyncio.is_async_test which returns whether a
    test item is managed by pytest-asyncio #​376
  • Removes and pytest-trio, mypy, and flaky from the test
    dependencies #​620, #​674, #​678

v0.22.0: pytest-asyncio 0.22.0 (yanked)

Compare Source

This release deprecated event loop overrides, but didn't provide adequate replacement functionality for all relevant use cases. As such, the release was yanked from PyPI.

0.22.0 (2023-10-31)
  • Class-scoped and module-scoped event loops can be requested
    via the asyncio_event_loop mark. #​620
  • Deprecate redefinition of the event_loop fixture. #​587
    Users requiring a class-scoped or module-scoped asyncio event loop for their tests
    should mark the corresponding class or module with asyncio_event_loop.
  • Test items based on asynchronous generators always exit with xfail status and emit a warning during the collection phase. This behavior is consistent with synchronous yield tests. #​642
  • Remove support for Python 3.7
  • Declare support for Python 3.12

v0.21.2: pytest-asyncio 0.21.2

Compare Source

0.21.2 (2024-04-29)

  • Fix compatibility with pytest 8.2. Backport of #​800 to pytest-asyncio v0.21 for users who are unable to upgrade to a more recent version (see #​706

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Aug 27, 2024

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: poetry.lock
Updating dependencies
Resolving dependencies...

Creating virtualenv todoist-api-python-oE7yOUU_-py3.12 in /home/ubuntu/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs

Because no versions of pytest-asyncio match >0.24.0,<0.25.0
 and pytest-asyncio (0.24.0) depends on pytest (>=8.2,<9), pytest-asyncio (>=0.24.0,<0.25.0) requires pytest (>=8.2,<9).
So, because todoist-api-python depends on both pytest (^7.2.0) and pytest-asyncio (^0.24.0), version solving failed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants