Skip to content

Conversation

@julianmorillo
Copy link
Contributor

Dependency towards finally adding ESPResSo

@julianmorillo
Copy link
Contributor Author

bot: build repo:dev.eessi.io-riscv-2025.06-001 instance:eessi-bot-riscv for:arch=riscv64/generic

@riscv-eessi-io-bot
Copy link

riscv-eessi-io-bot bot commented Jan 26, 2026

New job on instance eessi-bot-riscv for repository dev.eessi.io-riscv-2025.06-001
Building on: generic
Building for: riscv64/generic
Job dir: /home/eessibot/shared/jobs/2026.01/pr_25/262698

date job status comment
Jan 26 12:09:44 UTC 2026 submitted job id 262698 awaits release by job manager
Jan 26 12:09:51 UTC 2026 released job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Jan 26 12:10:54 UTC 2026 running job 262698 is running
Jan 26 19:20:02 UTC 2026 finished
😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-262698.out
✅ no message matching FATAL:
❌ found message matching ERROR:
❌ found message matching FAILED:
❌ found message matching required modules missing:
❌ no message matching No missing installations
✅ found message matching .tar.* created!
Artefacts
eessi-2025.06-software-linux-riscv64-generic-riscv-1769453656.tar.gzsize: 326 MiB (342031346 bytes)
entries: 3679
modules under 2025.06-001/software/linux/riscv64/generic/modules/all
Catch2/2.13.10-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
Cython/3.1.1-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
Eigen/3.4.0-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
ICU/76.1-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
expat/2.6.4-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
flit/3.10.1-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
gfbf/2025a.lua
git/2.49.0-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
hatchling/1.27.0-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
patchelf/0.18.0-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
scikit-build-core/0.11.1-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
scikit-build/0.18.1-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
setuptools-rust/1.11.0-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
software under 2025.06-001/software/linux/riscv64/generic/software
Catch2/2.13.10-GCCcore-14.2.0
Cython/3.1.1-GCCcore-14.2.0
Eigen/3.4.0-GCCcore-14.2.0
ICU/76.1-GCCcore-14.2.0
expat/2.6.4-GCCcore-14.2.0
flit/3.10.1-GCCcore-14.2.0
gfbf/2025a
git/2.49.0-GCCcore-14.2.0
hatchling/1.27.0-GCCcore-14.2.0
patchelf/0.18.0-GCCcore-14.2.0
scikit-build-core/0.11.1-GCCcore-14.2.0
scikit-build/0.18.1-GCCcore-14.2.0
setuptools-rust/1.11.0-GCCcore-14.2.0
reprod directories under 2025.06-001/software/linux/riscv64/generic/reprod
no reprod directories in tarball
other under 2025.06-001/software/linux/riscv64/generic
no other files in tarball
Jan 26 19:20:02 UTC 2026 test result
🤷 UNKNOWN (click triangle for detailed information)
  • Job test file _bot_job262698.test does not exist in job directory, or parsing it failed.

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented Jan 27, 2026

Two internal compiler errors when it was compiling Boost:

gcc.compile.c++ bin.v2/libs/log/build/gcc-14/release/riscv_64/threading-multi/visibility-hidden/setup/default_formatter_factory.o
In file included from ./boost/range/functions.hpp:18,
                 from ./boost/range/iterator_range_core.hpp:41,
                 from ./boost/algorithm/string/replace.hpp:16,
                 from ./boost/date_time/date_facet.hpp:17,
                 from ./boost/date_time/gregorian/gregorian_io.hpp:16,
                 from ./boost/date_time/gregorian/gregorian.hpp:31,
                 from ./boost/date_time/posix_time/time_formatters.hpp:12,
                 from ./boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time.hpp:24,
                 from ./boost/date_time/local_time/local_date_time.hpp:18,
                 from ./boost/date_time/local_time/local_time_types.hpp:11,
                 from libs/log/src/setup/default_formatter_factory.cpp:29:
./boost/range/begin.hpp:46:5: internal compiler error: in ggc_set_mark, at ggc-page.cc:1554
   46 |     }
      |     ^
0x856c39 ggc_set_mark(void const*)
        ../../gcc/ggc-page.cc:1554
0x7bb673 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:107
0x7bbc6b gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:450
0x7bc3fb gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:441
0x7bc3cb gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:435
0x7bc381 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:418
0x7bbbeb gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:468
0x7bbc01 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:472
0x7bbc01 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:472
0x7bbc01 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:472
0x7bbc01 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:472
0x7bbc01 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:472
0xa20e4b gt_ggc_mx_tree_statement_list_node(void*)
        /tmp/eessibot/easybuild/build/GCCcore/14.2.0/system-system/gcc-14.2.0/stage3_obj/gcc/gtype-desc.cc:1882
0x7bba95 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:519
0x7bbc01 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:472
0x7bc243 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:352
0x7bb973 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:568
0x7bb973 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:568
0x7bc079 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:208
0x7bbc01 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:472
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using -freport-bug).
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.

and

gcc.compile.c++ bin.v2/libs/log/build/gcc-14/release/riscv_64/link-static/threading-multi/visibility-hidden/setup/default_formatter_factory.o
In file included from ./boost/range/functions.hpp:18,
                 from ./boost/range/iterator_range_core.hpp:41,
                 from ./boost/algorithm/string/replace.hpp:16,
                 from ./boost/date_time/date_facet.hpp:17,
                 from ./boost/date_time/gregorian/gregorian_io.hpp:16,
                 from ./boost/date_time/gregorian/gregorian.hpp:31,
                 from ./boost/date_time/posix_time/time_formatters.hpp:12,
                 from ./boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time.hpp:24,
                 from ./boost/date_time/local_time/local_date_time.hpp:18,
                 from ./boost/date_time/local_time/local_time_types.hpp:11,
                 from libs/log/src/setup/default_formatter_factory.cpp:29:
./boost/range/begin.hpp:46:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
   46 |     }
      |     ^
0xc62307 crash_signal
        ../../gcc/toplev.cc:319
0x856bfc ggc_set_mark(void const*)
        ../../gcc/ggc-page.cc:1563
0x7bb673 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:107
0x7bbc1d gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:455
0x7bbc6b gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:450
0x7bb83d gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:613
0x7bb921 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:672
0x7bc733 gt_ggc_mx_lang_decl(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:56
0x7bc61b gt_ggc_mx_lang_decl(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:49
0x7bc61b gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:326
0x7bc3eb gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:439
0x7bbc61 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:449
0x7bbc3b gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:460
0x7bbc6b gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:450
0x7bb83d gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:613
0x7bb921 gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:672
0x7bc733 gt_ggc_mx_lang_decl(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:56
0x7bc61b gt_ggc_mx_lang_decl(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:49
0x7bc61b gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:326
0x7bc3eb gt_ggc_mx_lang_tree_node(void*)
        ./gt-cp-tree.h:439
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using -freport-bug).
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.

@julianmorillo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Let's go step by step, then. Submitted #26 (first dependency of SciPy-bundle 2025.06)

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented Jan 28, 2026

bot: build repo:dev.eessi.io-riscv-2025.06-001 instance:eessi-bot-riscv for:arch=riscv64/generic

@riscv-eessi-io-bot
Copy link

riscv-eessi-io-bot bot commented Jan 28, 2026

New job on instance eessi-bot-riscv for repository dev.eessi.io-riscv-2025.06-001
Building on: generic
Building for: riscv64/generic
Job dir: /home/eessibot/shared/jobs/2026.01/pr_25/263059

date job status comment
Jan 28 22:44:07 UTC 2026 submitted job id 263059 awaits release by job manager
Jan 28 22:44:48 UTC 2026 released job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Jan 28 22:45:54 UTC 2026 running job 263059 is running
Jan 29 07:20:03 UTC 2026 finished
😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-263059.out
✅ no message matching FATAL:
❌ found message matching ERROR:
❌ found message matching FAILED:
❌ found message matching required modules missing:
❌ no message matching No missing installations
✅ found message matching .tar.* created!
Artefacts
eessi-2025.06-software-linux-riscv64-generic-riscv-1769670887.tar.zstsize: 67 MiB (71225859 bytes)
entries: 19836
modules under 2025.06-001/software/linux/riscv64/generic/modules/all
Boost/1.88.0-GCC-14.2.0.lua
Catch2/2.13.10-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
Cython/3.1.1-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
Eigen/3.4.0-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
ICU/76.1-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
gfbf/2025a.lua
meson-python/0.18.0-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
pybind11/2.13.6-GCC-14.2.0.lua
spin/0.14-GCCcore-14.2.0.lua
software under 2025.06-001/software/linux/riscv64/generic/software
Boost/1.88.0-GCC-14.2.0
Catch2/2.13.10-GCCcore-14.2.0
Cython/3.1.1-GCCcore-14.2.0
Eigen/3.4.0-GCCcore-14.2.0
ICU/76.1-GCCcore-14.2.0
gfbf/2025a
meson-python/0.18.0-GCCcore-14.2.0
pybind11/2.13.6-GCC-14.2.0
spin/0.14-GCCcore-14.2.0
reprod directories under 2025.06-001/software/linux/riscv64/generic/reprod
no reprod directories in tarball
other under 2025.06-001/software/linux/riscv64/generic
no other files in tarball
Jan 29 07:20:03 UTC 2026 test result
🤷 UNKNOWN (click triangle for detailed information)
  • Job test file _bot_job263059.test does not exist in job directory, or parsing it failed.

@julianmorillo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Failed again, submitted #28 with another dependency to go step by step

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented Jan 29, 2026

It got pretty far this time. Boost installed without issues, and it even built the scipy extension, but a bunch of tests failed:

=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED scipy/_lib/tests/test_import_cycles.py::test_public_modules_importable
FAILED scipy/special/tests/test_nan_inputs.py::test_nan_inputs[sph_harm] - As...
FAILED scipy/special/tests/test_sph_harm.py::TestSphHarm::test_all[1-7] - Ass...
FAILED scipy/special/tests/test_sph_harm.py::TestSphHarm::test_all[1-10] - As...
FAILED scipy/special/tests/test_sph_harm.py::TestSphHarm::test_all[1-50] - As...
FAILED scipy/special/tests/test_sph_harm.py::TestSphHarm::test_all[4-7] - Ass...
FAILED scipy/special/tests/test_sph_harm.py::TestSphHarm::test_all[4-10] - As...
FAILED scipy/special/tests/test_sph_harm.py::TestSphHarm::test_all[4-50] - As...
FAILED scipy/special/tests/test_sph_harm.py::TestSphHarm::test_all[5-7] - Ass...
FAILED scipy/special/tests/test_sph_harm.py::TestSphHarm::test_all[5-10] - As...
FAILED scipy/special/tests/test_sph_harm.py::TestSphHarm::test_all[5-50] - As...
FAILED scipy/special/tests/test_sph_harm.py::TestSphHarm::test_all[9-7] - Ass...
FAILED scipy/special/tests/test_sph_harm.py::TestSphHarm::test_all[9-10] - As...
FAILED scipy/special/tests/test_sph_harm.py::TestSphHarm::test_all[9-50] - As...
FAILED scipy/special/tests/test_sph_harm.py::TestSphHarm::test_all[14-7] - As...
FAILED scipy/special/tests/test_sph_harm.py::TestSphHarm::test_all[14-10] - A...
FAILED scipy/special/tests/test_sph_harm.py::TestSphHarm::test_all[14-50] - A...
= 17 failed, 78492 passed, 5163 skipped, 305 xfailed, 15 xpassed, 2748 warnings in 6123.71s (1:42:03) =

@julianmorillo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Submitted #29. Let's build dependencies to avoid wasting compute hours.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants