-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
{2023.06}[2023a, sapphire_rapids] TensorFlow 2.13.0 #864
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
{2023.06}[2023a, sapphire_rapids] TensorFlow 2.13.0 #864
Conversation
bedroge
commented
Jan 20, 2025
Instance
|
Instance
|
Instance
|
bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software arch:x86_64/intel/sapphire_rapids |
Updates by the bot instance
|
Updates by the bot instance
|
Updates by the bot instance
|
New job on instance
|
bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software arch:x86_64/intel/sapphire_rapids |
Updates by the bot instance
|
Updates by the bot instance
|
Updates by the bot instance
|
New job on instance
|
bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software arch:x86_64/intel/sapphire_rapids |
Updates by the bot instance
|
Updates by the bot instance
|
Updates by the bot instance
|
New job on instance
|
Though this worked, I had to use additional patches for the OpenBLAS and SciPy-bundle easyconfigs. I guess we can go ahead and merge this, and then do a rebuild of thosr modules for all CPU targets to make sure everything is the same? |
I looked at the OpenBLAS patch and that doesn't seem worth the rebuild (it just catches the Sapphaire Rapids for some if statements). The SCipy one is a bug fix though, and that one may be worth it. Either way, this can be deployed. |
See #866. |
Staging PR ingested |
PR merged! Moved |
PR merged! Moved |
PR merged! Moved |