Skip to content

feat: non inverted SBUS trainer support on serial inputs on H5/H7#7133

Open
3djc wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
3djc/sbus-aux-support
Open

feat: non inverted SBUS trainer support on serial inputs on H5/H7#7133
3djc wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
3djc/sbus-aux-support

Conversation

@3djc
Copy link
Collaborator

@3djc 3djc commented Feb 26, 2026

This PR does 3 things:

  • sanitize translations: "SBUS trainer" was used when actually inverted SBUS was required
  • allow H5/H7 radio to choose either mode, so that regular SBUS or inverted can both be use for trainer on serial ports
  • provide ETX_Pol_Inverted support to simple uarts (ie not "ports")

@elecpower could you take care of the companion side ?

@3djc 3djc added enhancement ✨ New feature or request needs: companion labels Feb 26, 2026
@3djc 3djc changed the title feat(H7/H5): SBUS trainer support on serial inputs feat(H7/H5): non inverted SBUS trainer support on serial inputs Feb 26, 2026
@pfeerick pfeerick changed the title feat(H7/H5): non inverted SBUS trainer support on serial inputs feat: non inverted SBUS trainer support on serial inputs on H7/H5 Feb 26, 2026
@pfeerick pfeerick changed the title feat: non inverted SBUS trainer support on serial inputs on H7/H5 feat: non inverted SBUS trainer support on serial inputs on H5/H7 Feb 26, 2026
@elecpower
Copy link
Collaborator

@elecpower could you take care of the companion side ?

Yes

@elecpower
Copy link
Collaborator

@3djc when #7136 is merged into 3.0 any cpu related features will required separate PRs for earlier versions, so what versions are you planning to add this to?

@3djc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

3djc commented Feb 27, 2026

Whatever makes your life easier. If 3.0 only, so be it

@pfeerick
Copy link
Member

pfeerick commented Feb 27, 2026 via email

@elecpower
Copy link
Collaborator

I'll do one for each with the 3.0 post CPU merge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement ✨ New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants