docs: clarify operator revocation, validator veto, and #274 leak formula#292
Open
rvagg wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
docs: clarify operator revocation, validator veto, and #274 leak formula#292rvagg wants to merge 1 commit into
rvagg wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. @@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #292 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage ? 77.25%
=======================================
Files ? 5
Lines ? 554
Branches ? 107
=======================================
Hits ? 428
Misses ? 121
Partials ? 5
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This was referenced Jun 24, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I found this unstaged edit from an audit I did a couple of months ago.
I want to do some refactoring of the docs and figured these are worthwhile additions before I go ahead and propose moving things around.