Skip to content

Conversation

@CarloLucibello
Copy link
Member

@CarloLucibello CarloLucibello commented Dec 31, 2024

marks as broken an enzyme test that makes the CI fail. Also, moves the enzyme testing utilities to the test_gradients function.

@test g[1].bias ≈ ones(Float32, 4)
end
end
using Enzyme: Enzyme, Duplicated, Const, Active
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe this PR is a good time to insert an if VERSION < v"1.12-" in front of using Enzyme? Then CI on nightly might start telling us things again.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Want to rebase on #2569?

Copy link
Member

@ToucheSir ToucheSir Dec 31, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Between Enzyme and CUDA, I wonder if we shouldn't move (Flux.jl, Zygote can stay) CI to test on prereleases instead of nightly. The signal-to-noise ratio of testing only nightly is quite low because of how often those two deps are broken on it.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 32.50%. Comparing base (13bb061) to head (274922d).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2563   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   32.50%   32.50%           
=======================================
  Files          34       34           
  Lines        2003     2003           
=======================================
  Hits          651      651           
  Misses       1352     1352           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@CarloLucibello CarloLucibello merged commit cb9bb30 into master Jan 1, 2025
9 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants