Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(gke): delete old region tags from django_tutorial #13113

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

eapl-gemugami
Copy link
Contributor

@eapl-gemugami eapl-gemugami commented Jan 29, 2025

Description

Fixes Internal:
b/347350154
b/347350144

Checklist

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added samples Issues that are directly related to samples. api: container Issues related to the Kubernetes Engine API API. labels Jan 29, 2025
Copy link

@code-review-assist code-review-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi team,

I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will provide my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary for you and other reviewers to quickly get up to speed:

This pull request, chore(gke): delete old region tags from django_tutorial, aims to clean up the django_tutorial example by removing outdated region tags from the codebase. The changes are focused on removing obsolete comment blocks related to Google Cloud region configurations.

Here's a breakdown of the changes:

  • kubernetes_engine/django_tutorial/Dockerfile: Removed two comment blocks: # [START docker] and # [END docker] (lines 14-15 and 32).
  • kubernetes_engine/django_tutorial/mysite/settings.py: Removed two comment blocks: # [START dbconfig] and # [END dbconfig] (lines 79 and 94).

The author, eapl-gemugami, has indicated that all tests and linting checks have passed.

This PR appears to be a straightforward cleanup, improving code readability and maintainability by removing unnecessary comments. I'll be checking for any potential side effects of removing these comments, but at first glance, it seems safe.


And now, a little haiku to lighten the mood:

Old tags now removed,
Code shines, clean and bright anew,
Review, then merge on!

Copy link

@code-review-assist code-review-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This pull request removes outdated region tags from the kubernetes_engine/django_tutorial sample. Removing these tags helps to keep the sample clean and up-to-date with the latest documentation. The changes are minimal and straightforward, and the code adheres to the guidelines outlined in AUTHORING_GUIDE.MD.

I noticed that the checklist in the pull request description mentions merging the PR after approval. As a bot, I can't approve or merge PRs, but I can offer feedback on its readiness. Assuming the CI tests pass, this PR looks good to merge. Well done!

@eapl-gemugami eapl-gemugami added the snippet-bot:force-run Force snippet-bot runs its logic label Jan 29, 2025
@snippet-bot snippet-bot bot removed the snippet-bot:force-run Force snippet-bot runs its logic label Jan 29, 2025
Copy link

snippet-bot bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Here is the summary of changes.

You are about to delete 2 region tags.

This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
If you find problems with this result, please file an issue at:
https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/issues.
To update this comment, add snippet-bot:force-run label or use the checkbox below:

  • Refresh this comment

@eapl-gemugami eapl-gemugami marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2025 23:56
@eapl-gemugami eapl-gemugami requested review from a team as code owners January 29, 2025 23:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: container Issues related to the Kubernetes Engine API API. samples Issues that are directly related to samples.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants