comonoid objects in opposite category are monoids #2004
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Ali Caglayan <[email protected]> <!-- ps-id: 2c0868b4-6988-4d60-b8c8-d3b7ef434621 -->
Collaborator
Author
|
cc @ThomatoTomato as you had a look at this before. |
jdchristensen
approved these changes
Jun 30, 2024
Co-authored-by: Dan Christensen <[email protected]>
Alizter
deleted the
ps/rr/comonoid_objects_in_opposite_category_are_monoids
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here we prove that comonoid objects in an opposite category are monoid objects in the original category.
This is for #1929.