Feat/angular roadmap #424
Feat/angular roadmap #424
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new "feature-roadmap" module within the blog library. It adds configurations for ESLint, Jest, and TypeScript, along with project metadata in a JSON file. New Angular components, pipes, and SCSS files implement a dynamic, SVG-based roadmap interface. A new route is added for lazy-loading the roadmap shell component that integrates various UI elements. Additionally, testing setup and documentation files are created or updated to support the new feature. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant R as Router
participant RS as RoadmapShellComponent
participant F as FeatureRoadmapComponent
U->>R: Navigate to /roadmap
R->>RS: Lazy-load RoadmapShellComponent
RS->>F: Render FeatureRoadmapComponent
F-->>RS: Return rendered roadmap view
RS->>U: Display roadmap page
sequenceDiagram
participant F as FeatureRoadmapComponent
participant D as Data (nodesDto)
participant C as Computation (roadmapLayers)
participant UI as UI Components
F->>D: Initialize nodesDto
F->>C: Process nodesDto to build layers, clusters, and mappings
C-->>F: Return computed roadmap layers
F->>UI: Render nodes via UI components (Primary, Secondary, Angular Love, Cluster)
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
PR is detected, will deploy to dev environment |
|
Deployed to dev environment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Nitpick comments (15)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-angular-love-node.component.ts (1)
9-12: Consider extracting CSS variables to a shared fileThe CSS variables defined inline are duplicated across multiple node components (primary, secondary, and this one) as seen in the relevant code snippets.
Consider extracting these variables to a shared styles file to maintain consistency and make theme changes easier. This would reduce duplication across your node components.
- style=" - --primary-color: #B3004A; --secondary-color: #66002B; --gradient-color: #481CAB; --on-hover-border-1: #923CFF; --on-hover-border-2: #FF006A" + class="roadmap-node-theme"Then define these variables in a shared SCSS file that all node components can import.
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.spec.ts (1)
1-22: Basic test structure looks good, but could benefit from more comprehensive test coverage.The test file correctly sets up the TestBed configuration and verifies component creation. However, for a component that manages a complex roadmap structure with SVG visuals, consider adding more test cases to verify:
- Proper rendering of different node types
- Correct layer calculations
- Edge cases like empty layers or single nodes
// Example of additional tests you might want to add: it('should display layers correctly when data is provided', () => { // Setup test data component.roadmapData = mockRoadmapData; fixture.detectChanges(); // Assert expected DOM elements const layerElements = fixture.nativeElement.querySelectorAll('.layer'); expect(layerElements.length).toBe(mockRoadmapData.length); }); it('should handle empty roadmap data gracefully', () => { // Test with empty data component.roadmapData = []; fixture.detectChanges(); // Assert appropriate handling expect(fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('.no-data-message')).toBeTruthy(); });libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-primary-node.component.ts (1)
5-21: Component template could benefit from improved accessibility and maintainability.The component is well-structured, but there are potential improvements:
- The hardcoded colors in the style attribute should be moved to a theme file for better maintainability
- Consider adding ARIA attributes for improved accessibility
- Color contrast should be verified for WCAG compliance
@Component({ selector: 'al-ui-roadmap-primary-node', template: ` <div class="roadmap-hover-border-gradient relative w-fit text-nowrap rounded-lg bg-[#FDF5FD] text-[#FDF5FD]" - style=" - --primary-color: #B3004A; --secondary-color: #66002B; --gradient-color: #481CAB; --on-hover-border-1: #923CFF; --on-hover-border-2: #FF006A" + [ngClass]="'theme-primary'" + role="listitem" + aria-label="Primary roadmap node: {{node().title}}" > <div class="relative z-10 m-[4px] rounded-lg bg-[--primary-color] px-6 py-4" > <div class="text-[24px]">{{ node().title }}</div> </div> </div> `, styleUrls: ['./roadmap-hover-border-gradient.scss'], })Then define theme classes in your SCSS file:
// In roadmap-hover-border-gradient.scss .theme-primary { --primary-color: #B3004A; --secondary-color: #66002B; --gradient-color: #481CAB; --on-hover-border-1: #923CFF; --on-hover-border-2: #FF006A; }libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/slice.pipes.ts (3)
3-11: Good implementation but consider making the pipe standalone.The LeftSlicePipe implementation is clean and functional. For modern Angular applications (v14+), it's recommended to make pipes standalone.
@Pipe({ name: 'leftSlice', + standalone: true, }) export class LeftSlicePipe implements PipeTransform { transform<T>(value: T[]): T[] { const halfLength = Math.ceil(value.length / 2); return value.slice(0, halfLength); } }
13-21: Good implementation but consider making the pipe standalone.The RightSlicePipe implementation is clean and functional. For modern Angular applications (v14+), it's recommended to make pipes standalone.
@Pipe({ name: 'rightSlice', + standalone: true, }) export class RightSlicePipe implements PipeTransform { transform<T>(value: T[]): T[] { const halfLength = Math.ceil(value.length / 2); return value.slice(halfLength); } }
7-10: Consider handling edge cases in pipe implementations.While the pipe implementations work for valid arrays, they don't handle edge cases like null or undefined values.
// For LeftSlicePipe transform<T>(value: T[]): T[] { + if (!value || !Array.isArray(value)) { + return []; + } const halfLength = Math.ceil(value.length / 2); return value.slice(0, halfLength); } // For RightSlicePipe transform<T>(value: T[]): T[] { + if (!value || !Array.isArray(value)) { + return []; + } const halfLength = Math.ceil(value.length / 2); return value.slice(halfLength); }Also applies to: 17-20
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.html (1)
65-66: Type casting with $any() indicates a potential type mismatch.The use of
$any()for type casting suggests that the node type doesn't match the expected cluster type. This should be resolved with proper typing.// In the component class, add a type guard: isCluster(node: RoadmapNode): node is RoadmapCluster { return node.nodeType === 'cluster'; } // Then in the template: <al-ui-roadmap-cluster - [cluster]="$any(node)" + [cluster]="node" *ngIf="isCluster(node)" ></al-ui-roadmap-cluster>Also applies to: 77-78
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-secondary-node.component.ts (1)
5-21: Consider accessibility and theming improvementsThe component implementation is clean, but consider:
- The hardcoded color values like
#B3004A,#66002B, etc. might be better placed in a central theme file for easier maintenance- Verify that the text colors provide sufficient contrast with the background for accessibility (WCAG compliance)
You could refactor the inline styles to use application-wide CSS variables:
- style=" - --primary-color: #B3004A; --secondary-color: #66002B; --gradient-color: #481CAB; --on-hover-border-1: #923CFF; --on-hover-border-2: #FF006A" + style=" + --primary-color: var(--theme-primary-color, #B3004A); --secondary-color: var(--theme-secondary-color, #66002B); --gradient-color: var(--theme-gradient-color, #481CAB); --on-hover-border-1: var(--theme-hover-border-1, #923CFF); --on-hover-border-2: var(--theme-hover-border-2, #FF006A)"libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-cluster.component.ts (2)
5-26: Well-structured template with modern Angular syntaxGreat use of modern Angular control flow with the
@forloop and proper tracking by node ID. The component structure is clean and follows Angular best practices.As with the other component, consider:
- Extracting color values to a theme file
- Verifying color contrast for accessibility
27-32: Consider centralizing styling variablesThe host binding approach is good, but the inline color variables could be moved to a central theme:
- style: - '--primary-color: #B3004A; --secondary-color: #66002B; --gradient-color: #481CAB; --on-hover-border-1: #923CFF; --on-hover-border-2: #FF006A', + style: + '--primary-color: var(--theme-primary-color, #B3004A); --secondary-color: var(--theme-secondary-color, #66002B); --gradient-color: var(--theme-gradient-color, #481CAB); --on-hover-border-1: var(--theme-hover-border-1, #923CFF); --on-hover-border-2: var(--theme-hover-border-2, #FF006A)',libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/roadmap-hover-border-gradient.scss (1)
1-32: Well-implemented hover gradient effect with animationThe gradient border effect implementation with the ::before pseudo-element and rotation animation is clean. The exclusion of .cluster-node elements from the hover effect is handled appropriately.
Consider if the 2000px dimensions for the pseudo-element are necessary - while it works, a smaller size might be more performance-friendly, especially on mobile devices.
- width: 2000px; - height: 2000px; - top: calc(50% - 1000px); - left: calc(50% - 1000px); + width: 1000px; + height: 1000px; + top: calc(50% - 500px); + left: calc(50% - 500px);libs/blog/shell/feature-shell-web/src/lib/roadmap-shell.component.ts (3)
20-30: Simplified template without top banner or router outletThe template only includes header, roadmap feature, and footer components, which is simpler than the RootShellComponent shown in the relevant snippets. However, the component still initializes and processes ad banner data that isn't used in the template.
If ad banners aren't intended to be shown in this view, consider removing the related code to simplify the component.
59-60: Hardcoded adBannerVisible valueThe adBannerVisible computed value is hardcoded to always return false, which means the effect to set viewport offset will always set it to [0, 80].
Consider simplifying this since the value never changes:
- // todo: temporary solution to keep in mind how banner influence the layout - protected readonly adBannerVisible = computed(() => false); + // Banner is not displayed in roadmap view + protected readonly adBannerVisible = false;
1-89: Component structure duplicates RootShellComponentThis component shares significant code with RootShellComponent from the provided context snippets, suggesting potential duplication.
Consider extracting common functionality to a base class or shared service to avoid duplication between shell components. Alternatively, evaluate if this component could extend RootShellComponent and override only what's different.
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/temp.component.ts (1)
46-49: Multiple calls togeneratePathcould accumulate paths inpathData.
Each call appends a new path topathData. If the intended behavior is to render multiple paths, this is fine. Otherwise, consider clearing or resetting the array before subsequent calls to avoid unintentional duplication.ngOnInit(): void { - this.generatePath(); - this.generatePath(120); - this.generatePath(300); + this.pathData = []; + [0, 120, 300].forEach((len) => this.generatePath(len)); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (23)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/.eslintrc.json(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/README.md(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/jest.config.ts(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/project.json(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/index.ts(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.html(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.spec.ts(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.ts(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/slice.pipes.ts(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/temp.component.ts(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/roadmap-hover-border-gradient.scss(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-angular-love-node.component.ts(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-cluster.component.ts(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-primary-node.component.ts(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-secondary-node.component.ts(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/test-setup.ts(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/tsconfig.lib.json(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/tsconfig.spec.json(1 hunks)libs/blog/shell/feature-shell-web/src/lib/blog-shell.routes.ts(1 hunks)libs/blog/shell/feature-shell-web/src/lib/roadmap-shell.component.ts(1 hunks)libs/blog/shell/feature-shell-web/src/lib/root-shell.component.ts(1 hunks)tsconfig.base.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (5)
libs/blog/shell/feature-shell-web/src/lib/roadmap-shell.component.ts (2)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.ts (1)
Component(39-214)libs/blog/shell/feature-shell-web/src/lib/root-shell.component.ts (1)
Component(22-109)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-primary-node.component.ts (3)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-angular-love-node.component.ts (1)
Component(5-24)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-secondary-node.component.ts (1)
Component(5-24)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.ts (2)
Component(39-214)RoadmapNode(23-27)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-angular-love-node.component.ts (3)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-primary-node.component.ts (1)
Component(5-24)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-secondary-node.component.ts (1)
Component(5-24)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.ts (2)
Component(39-214)RoadmapNode(23-27)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-secondary-node.component.ts (3)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-angular-love-node.component.ts (1)
Component(5-24)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-primary-node.component.ts (1)
Component(5-24)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.ts (2)
Component(39-214)RoadmapNode(23-27)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.ts (4)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-angular-love-node.component.ts (1)
Component(5-24)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-primary-node.component.ts (1)
Component(5-24)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-cluster.component.ts (1)
Component(5-37)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-secondary-node.component.ts (1)
Component(5-24)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.ts
[error] 106-106: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
[error] 161-161: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
[error] 180-180: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
🔇 Additional comments (23)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/index.ts (1)
1-1: Clear Public API ExportThe export statement correctly re-exports all public members from the FeatureRoadmapComponent, making it easier to import from a single entry point. This meets the goal of simplifying the public API for the roadmap feature.
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/README.md (1)
1-8: Informative README FileThe README provides a succinct description of the library and clear instructions on running the unit tests (i.e., using
nx test feature-roadmap). Including the Nx reference is helpful for developers who might be new to this setup.libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/test-setup.ts (1)
1-6: Robust Test Environment ConfigurationThe use of
setupZoneTestEnvwith strict options (errorOnUnknownElementsanderrorOnUnknownPropertiesset to true) establishes a solid testing foundation. This configuration will help catch unintended template errors and is aligned with best practices for Angular testing.libs/blog/shell/feature-shell-web/src/lib/root-shell.component.ts (1)
57-59: Effective Host Styling AdditionThe new
hostproperty that applies the classes'flex flex-col min-h-screen'is a clean solution to enforce the desired layout on the component’s host element. This change is well-targeted and integrates seamlessly with the component’s styling strategy.tsconfig.base.json (1)
191-193: Accurate Module Path MappingThe newly added path alias
"@angular-love/feature-roadmap"correctly points tolibs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/index.ts. This change facilitates easier imports and enhances TypeScript module resolution for the roadmap feature.libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/tsconfig.lib.json (1)
1-17: Configuration looks appropriate for an Angular libraryThe TypeScript configuration extends the base config and sets up standard library options:
- Output directory correctly points to the dist folder
- Declaration files and source maps are enabled for better debugging
- Test files are properly excluded
- Only TypeScript files from src are included
This follows standard practices for Angular libraries built with Nx.
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/project.json (1)
1-20: Project configuration follows Nx standardsThe configuration properly defines:
- Project name, schema, and source root paths
- Angular component prefix "al" for consistent component naming
- Library project type
- Appropriate tags for monorepo organization
- Test and lint targets with correct executors
This setup aligns with Nx workspace best practices and will integrate well with the existing architecture.
libs/blog/shell/feature-shell-web/src/lib/blog-shell.routes.ts (1)
24-30: Route implementation follows Angular best practicesThe new roadmap route:
- Is correctly added to the commonRoutes array
- Uses lazy loading with async/await pattern
- Matches the module structure pattern used by other routes
This implementation maintains consistency with the existing routing architecture.
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-angular-love-node.component.ts (3)
1-4: Imports look correctAngular core imports and the RoadmapNode interface are properly imported.
5-21: Component definition follows Angular standardsThe template implementation:
- Uses Angular's standalone component pattern
- Follows the project's naming conventions with the 'al-' prefix
- Includes appropriate styling with CSS variables for theming
- Uses consistent styling approach with the related node components
The gradient styling and CSS variables approach allows for flexible theming.
22-24: Input property correctly implementedThe component:
- Uses Angular's modern input API
- Properly marks the node input as required
- Correctly types the input with the RoadmapNode interface
This ensures type safety and clear component API design.
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-primary-node.component.ts (1)
22-24: Component class implementation looks good.The implementation of the component class with a required input is clean and follows Angular's best practices for modern input syntax.
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.html (1)
1-88: Overall structure is complex but well-organized.The SVG-based roadmap visualization is complex but follows a logical structure. Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of different sections for improved maintainability.
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/.eslintrc.json (1)
1-36: ESLint configuration looks goodThe configuration properly extends the root ESLint config and sets up appropriate rules for Angular components and directives. The prefix "al" is used consistently across the feature components, which is a good practice for maintaining a clear namespace.
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/jest.config.ts (1)
1-21: Jest configuration is properly set upThe configuration correctly sets up Jest for Angular testing with appropriate transformations, serializers, and coverage reporting. The setup aligns with best practices for Angular libraries.
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-secondary-node.component.ts (2)
1-4: Imports look goodThe component correctly imports the necessary dependencies and the RoadmapNode type from the feature component.
22-24: Input usage looks goodThe component correctly uses Angular's input() API with required type checking, which is a modern approach.
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-cluster.component.ts (2)
1-4: Imports look goodThe component correctly imports the necessary dependencies and the RoadmapCluster type.
33-37: Input usage looks goodThe component correctly uses Angular's input() API with required type checking for the cluster property.
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/tsconfig.spec.json (1)
1-16: Configuration looks good for Jest testing in AngularThe TypeScript configuration properly extends the base config and includes all necessary settings for Jest-based testing, including correct module settings, target ECMAScript version, and type definitions.
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/tsconfig.json (1)
1-28: Good TypeScript configuration with strict settingsThe TypeScript configuration appropriately enables strict type checking and follows Angular best practices with the compiler options. The references to both lib and spec configurations are correctly set up.
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/temp.component.ts (2)
52-88: Looks good!
The SVG path generation logic is solid, and dynamically adjusting the SVG's dimensions to fit the path is a nice touch.
23-33:❓ Verification inconclusive
Potential structural directive concern with
@for.
This@for (path of pathData; track $index)syntax is non-standard in Angular unless you're intentionally using experimental features or a custom structural directive. Ensure it's functioning as expected in your application.Run this command to confirm whether a custom structural directive for
@foris defined:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash fd -e ts --exec rg "@Directive"Length of output: 226
Attention: Verify Custom
@forDirective ImplementationThe template syntax
@for (path of pathData; track $index)remains non-standard in Angular. Although our initial scan returned multiple occurrences of@Directive({in the codebase, we found no clear evidence of a custom structural directive specifically implemented for@for.
- Please confirm that a custom directive supporting the
@forsyntax is intentionally defined (e.g., with a selector like[for]) and documented.- If this syntax was not intended, consider reverting to the standard Angular
*ngForsyntax to prevent potential runtime issues.
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.html
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.html
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| @Component({ | ||
| selector: 'al-root-shell', | ||
| template: ` | ||
| <al-header | ||
| class="block w-full" | ||
| [language]="language()" | ||
| (languageChange)="onLanguageChange($event)" | ||
| > | ||
| <al-search /> | ||
| </al-header> | ||
| <al-feature-roadmap class="flex-1 basis-0" /> | ||
| <al-footer /> | ||
| `, | ||
| imports: [ | ||
| HeaderComponent, | ||
| FooterComponent, | ||
| SearchComponent, | ||
| FeatureRoadmapComponent, | ||
| ], | ||
| host: { | ||
| class: 'flex flex-col min-h-screen', | ||
| }, | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Selector name doesn't match component name
The selector al-root-shell doesn't match the component class name RoadmapShellComponent. This could lead to confusion since typically selectors should reflect the component name.
Change the selector to match the component name:
@Component({
- selector: 'al-root-shell',
+ selector: 'al-roadmap-shell',
template: `📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Component({ | |
| selector: 'al-root-shell', | |
| template: ` | |
| <al-header | |
| class="block w-full" | |
| [language]="language()" | |
| (languageChange)="onLanguageChange($event)" | |
| > | |
| <al-search /> | |
| </al-header> | |
| <al-feature-roadmap class="flex-1 basis-0" /> | |
| <al-footer /> | |
| `, | |
| imports: [ | |
| HeaderComponent, | |
| FooterComponent, | |
| SearchComponent, | |
| FeatureRoadmapComponent, | |
| ], | |
| host: { | |
| class: 'flex flex-col min-h-screen', | |
| }, | |
| }) | |
| @Component({ | |
| selector: 'al-roadmap-shell', | |
| template: ` | |
| <al-header | |
| class="block w-full" | |
| [language]="language()" | |
| (languageChange)="onLanguageChange($event)" | |
| > | |
| <al-search /> | |
| </al-header> | |
| <al-feature-roadmap class="flex-1 basis-0" /> | |
| <al-footer /> | |
| `, | |
| imports: [ | |
| HeaderComponent, | |
| FooterComponent, | |
| SearchComponent, | |
| FeatureRoadmapComponent, | |
| ], | |
| host: { | |
| class: 'flex flex-col min-h-screen', | |
| }, | |
| }) |
| constructor(viewport: ViewportScroller) { | ||
| // todo: temporary solution to keep in mind how banner influence the layout | ||
| effect(() => { | ||
| this.adBannerVisible() | ||
| ? viewport.setOffset([0, 160]) | ||
| : viewport.setOffset([0, 80]); | ||
| }); | ||
| this.sliderStore.getData(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Unnecessary data fetching for unused banners
The component calls this.sliderStore.getData() but doesn't display the data in the template.
If the ad banner data isn't needed in this view, remove the data fetch:
constructor(viewport: ViewportScroller) {
// todo: temporary solution to keep in mind how banner influence the layout
effect(() => {
this.adBannerVisible()
? viewport.setOffset([0, 160])
: viewport.setOffset([0, 80]);
});
- this.sliderStore.getData();
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| constructor(viewport: ViewportScroller) { | |
| // todo: temporary solution to keep in mind how banner influence the layout | |
| effect(() => { | |
| this.adBannerVisible() | |
| ? viewport.setOffset([0, 160]) | |
| : viewport.setOffset([0, 80]); | |
| }); | |
| this.sliderStore.getData(); | |
| } | |
| constructor(viewport: ViewportScroller) { | |
| // todo: temporary solution to keep in mind how banner influence the layout | |
| effect(() => { | |
| this.adBannerVisible() | |
| ? viewport.setOffset([0, 160]) | |
| : viewport.setOffset([0, 80]); | |
| }); | |
| } |
| protected readonly sliderStore = inject(AdBannerStore); | ||
| protected readonly slides = computed<AdImageBanner[] | undefined>(() => | ||
| this.sliderStore.slider()?.slides.map((slide) => ({ | ||
| url: slide.url, | ||
| alt: slide.alt, | ||
| action: { | ||
| type: 'url', | ||
| url: slide.navigateTo, | ||
| }, | ||
| })), | ||
| ); | ||
| protected readonly msPerSlide = computed( | ||
| () => this.sliderStore.slider()?.slideDisplayTimeMs, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Unused ad banner functionality
The component processes ad banner data (slides and msPerSlide) but doesn't use it in the template.
Since the template doesn't display an ad banner carousel, remove the unused code:
- protected readonly slides = computed<AdImageBanner[] | undefined>(() =>
- this.sliderStore.slider()?.slides.map((slide) => ({
- url: slide.url,
- alt: slide.alt,
- action: {
- type: 'url',
- url: slide.navigateTo,
- },
- })),
- );
- protected readonly msPerSlide = computed(
- () => this.sliderStore.slider()?.slideDisplayTimeMs,
- );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| protected readonly sliderStore = inject(AdBannerStore); | |
| protected readonly slides = computed<AdImageBanner[] | undefined>(() => | |
| this.sliderStore.slider()?.slides.map((slide) => ({ | |
| url: slide.url, | |
| alt: slide.alt, | |
| action: { | |
| type: 'url', | |
| url: slide.navigateTo, | |
| }, | |
| })), | |
| ); | |
| protected readonly msPerSlide = computed( | |
| () => this.sliderStore.slider()?.slideDisplayTimeMs, | |
| ); | |
| protected readonly sliderStore = inject(AdBannerStore); |
|
PR is detected, will deploy to dev environment |
|
Deployed to dev environment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (5)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.html (1)
29-38:⚠️ Potential issueSVG marker ID could cause conflicts with multiple component instances.
The hardcoded
id="arrowhead"could cause conflicts if multiple instances of this component exist on the same page.Generate unique IDs for SVG markers by incorporating the layer's parent node ID:
- id="arrowhead" + [attr.id]="'arrowhead-' + layer.parentNode.id"And update the reference:
- marker-end="url(#arrowhead)" + [attr.marker-end]="'url(#arrowhead-' + layer.parentNode.id + ')'"libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.ts (4)
52-52:⚠️ Potential issueIncorrect Angular configuration with
styleUrl.Angular expects
styleUrls(plural) as an array instead of the singularstyleUrlproperty.- styleUrl: './feature-roadmap.component.scss', + styleUrls: ['./feature-roadmap.component.scss'],
103-103: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAvoid spread syntax in reducers for better performance.
Using spread syntax in reducers causes O(n²) time complexity which can impact performance with larger datasets.
- (acc, node) => ({ ...acc, [node.id]: node }), + (acc, node) => { + acc[node.id] = node; + return acc; + },🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 103-103: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
157-161: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionOptimize the cluster creation reducer.
Using spread syntax in reducers causes O(n²) time complexity which can impact performance with larger datasets.
- (acc, primaryNodeId) => ({ - ...acc, - [nodeDtoMap[primaryNodeId].previousNodeId || 'initialNode']: primaryNodeId, - }), + (acc, primaryNodeId) => { + acc[nodeDtoMap[primaryNodeId].previousNodeId || 'initialNode'] = primaryNodeId; + return acc; + },🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 158-158: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
176-180: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionMinimize object creation overhead in layer mapping.
Using spread syntax in reducers causes O(n²) time complexity which can impact performance with larger datasets.
- (acc, primaryNodeId) => ({ - ...acc, - [nodeDtoMap[primaryNodeId].previousNodeId || 'initialNode']: primaryNodeId, - }), + (acc, primaryNodeId) => { + acc[nodeDtoMap[primaryNodeId].previousNodeId || 'initialNode'] = primaryNodeId; + return acc; + },🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 177-177: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.ts (3)
56-99: Consider externalizing roadmap data.Hard-coding the roadmap data directly in the component makes it difficult to maintain, update, or translate.
Consider moving this data to a separate service or configuration file:
// roadmap-data.service.ts @Injectable({ providedIn: 'root' }) export class RoadmapDataService { getRoadmapNodes(): RoadmapNodeDTO[] { return [ { id: '2', title: 'Components', }, // ... other nodes ]; } } // Then in your component: constructor(private roadmapDataService: RoadmapDataService) { this.nodesDto.set(this.roadmapDataService.getRoadmapNodes()); }
115-118: Avoid array spread for better performance.The spread operator creates a new array on each iteration, which is inefficient for large datasets.
- clusterMap[parentClusterNodeDto.id] = [ - ...(clusterMap[parentClusterNodeDto.id] ?? []), - nodeDto.id, - ]; + if (!clusterMap[parentClusterNodeDto.id]) { + clusterMap[parentClusterNodeDto.id] = []; + } + clusterMap[parentClusterNodeDto.id].push(nodeDto.id);
130-133: Avoid array spread for better performance.The spread operator creates a new array on each iteration, which is inefficient for large datasets.
- layerMap[nodeDto.parentNodeId] = [ - ...(layerMap[nodeDto.parentNodeId] ?? []), - nodeDto.id, - ]; + if (!layerMap[nodeDto.parentNodeId]) { + layerMap[nodeDto.parentNodeId] = []; + } + layerMap[nodeDto.parentNodeId].push(nodeDto.id);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.html(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.scss(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.ts(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/secondary-arrow.pipe.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.scss
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.ts (4)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-angular-love-node.component.ts (1)
Component(5-24)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-secondary-node.component.ts (1)
Component(5-24)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-primary-node.component.ts (1)
Component(5-24)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-cluster.component.ts (1)
Component(5-37)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.ts
[error] 103-103: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
[error] 158-158: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
[error] 177-177: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/secondary-arrow.pipe.ts (1)
19-26: LGTM! Implementation is clear and well-documented.The pipe effectively handles different cases for arrow generation with clear documentation. The arc calculation is properly implemented to create accurate curved corners.
| xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/1999/html" | ||
| > | ||
| <svg:foreignObject | ||
| style="transform: translateX(calc(50% - {{ layoutEl.clientWidth / 2 }}px))" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Template reference variable used before definition could cause rendering issues.
The translateX calculation references layoutEl.clientWidth before the #layoutEl element is fully rendered, which may cause incorrect initial positioning or flickering.
Consider using Angular's AfterViewInit lifecycle hook with ViewChild to calculate the translation after the view is fully rendered:
// In the component class
@ViewChild('layoutEl') layoutEl: ElementRef;
private translationOffset = signal(0);
ngAfterViewInit() {
// Calculate after view is initialized
this.translationOffset.set(this.layoutEl.nativeElement.clientWidth / 2);
}Then update your template:
- style="transform: translateX(calc(50% - {{ layoutEl.clientWidth / 2 }}px))"
+ style="transform: translateX(calc(50% - {{ translationOffset() }}px))"| @let shift = | ||
| (allChildNodesEl.clientWidth / 2 - leftChildNodesEl.clientWidth || | ||
| 0) - 32; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Layout calculation uses template references before initialization.
The calculation for shift uses allChildNodesEl and leftChildNodesEl template references potentially before they're fully initialized, which could lead to incorrect positioning.
Consider using a reactive approach with ViewChildren and AfterViewInit:
@ViewChildren('allChildNodesEl') allChildNodesElements: QueryList<ElementRef>;
@ViewChildren('leftChildNodesEl') leftChildNodesElements: QueryList<ElementRef>;
private nodeShifts = signal<{[key: string]: number}>({});
ngAfterViewInit() {
// Calculate shifts after view is initialized
this.calculateChildNodeShifts();
}
private calculateChildNodeShifts() {
// Calculate shifts for each layer's child nodes
// Store in nodeShifts signal for reactive updates
}Then in your template:
- @let shift =
- (allChildNodesEl.clientWidth / 2 - leftChildNodesEl.clientWidth || 0) - 32;
+ @let shift = nodeShifts()[layer.parentNode.id] || 0;| if (nodeDto.parentNodeId) { | ||
| if (nodeDtoMap[nodeDto.parentNodeId].parentNodeId) { | ||
| const parentClusterNodeDto = nodeDtoMap[nodeDto.parentNodeId]; | ||
|
|
||
| clusterMap[parentClusterNodeDto.id] = [ | ||
| ...(clusterMap[parentClusterNodeDto.id] ?? []), | ||
| nodeDto.id, | ||
| ]; | ||
|
|
||
| if (nodeMap[nodeDto.parentNodeId]) { | ||
| nodeMap[parentClusterNodeDto.id].nodeType = 'cluster'; | ||
| } else { | ||
| nodeMap[parentClusterNodeDto.id] = { | ||
| id: parentClusterNodeDto.id, | ||
| nodeType: 'cluster', | ||
| title: parentClusterNodeDto.title, | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| layerMap[nodeDto.parentNodeId] = [ | ||
| ...(layerMap[nodeDto.parentNodeId] ?? []), | ||
| nodeDto.id, | ||
| ]; | ||
| } | ||
| if (!nodeMap[nodeDto.id]) { | ||
| nodeMap[nodeDto.id] = { | ||
| id: nodeDto.id, | ||
| nodeType: 'secondary', | ||
| title: nodeDto.title, | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| nodeMap[nodeDto.id] = { | ||
| id: nodeDto.id, | ||
| nodeType: 'primary', | ||
| title: nodeDto.title, | ||
| }; | ||
| if (!layerMap[nodeDto.id]) { | ||
| layerMap[nodeDto.id] = []; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // setup clusters | ||
| Object.entries(clusterMap).forEach(([clusterNodeId, childrenNodeIds]) => { | ||
| const previousClusterNodeIdToNodeIdMap = childrenNodeIds.reduce( | ||
| (acc, primaryNodeId) => ({ | ||
| ...acc, | ||
| [nodeDtoMap[primaryNodeId].previousNodeId || 'initialNode']: | ||
| primaryNodeId, | ||
| }), | ||
| {} as { [previousNodeId: string | 'initialNode']: string }, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const clusterNode = nodeMap[clusterNodeId] as RoadmapCluster; | ||
| clusterNode.clusteredNodes = []; | ||
| let nextNodeId = previousClusterNodeIdToNodeIdMap['initialNode']; | ||
| while (nextNodeId) { | ||
| clusterNode.clusteredNodes.push(nodeMap[nextNodeId]); | ||
| nextNodeId = previousClusterNodeIdToNodeIdMap[nextNodeId]; | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // setup layers | ||
| const previousLayerNodeIdToNodeIdMap = Object.keys(layerMap).reduce( | ||
| (acc, primaryNodeId) => ({ | ||
| ...acc, | ||
| [nodeDtoMap[primaryNodeId].previousNodeId || 'initialNode']: | ||
| primaryNodeId, | ||
| }), | ||
| {} as { [previousNodeId: string | 'initialNode']: string }, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const layers: { | ||
| parentNode: RoadmapNode; | ||
| childNodes: RoadmapNode[]; | ||
| }[] = []; | ||
| let nextParentNodeId = previousLayerNodeIdToNodeIdMap['initialNode']; | ||
| while (nextParentNodeId) { | ||
| layers.push({ | ||
| parentNode: nodeMap[nextParentNodeId], | ||
| childNodes: layerMap[nextParentNodeId].map( | ||
| (childrenNodeId) => nodeMap[childrenNodeId], | ||
| ), | ||
| }); | ||
| nextParentNodeId = previousLayerNodeIdToNodeIdMap[nextParentNodeId]; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return [ | ||
| { | ||
| parentNode: { | ||
| id: '1', | ||
| title: 'Angular.Love Roadmap Introduction', | ||
| nodeType: 'angular-love', | ||
| }, | ||
| childNodes: [], | ||
| }, | ||
| ...layers, | ||
| ]; | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor complex roadmap calculation into smaller functions.
The roadmap calculation logic is very complex and contained in a single computed function, making it difficult to understand and maintain.
Break down the logic into smaller, focused functions:
protected readonly roadmapLayers = computed<RoadmapLayer[]>(() => {
const nodeDtoMap = this.createNodeDtoMap();
const { layerMap, clusterMap, nodeMap } = this.createMaps(nodeDtoMap);
this.setupClusters(clusterMap, nodeMap, nodeDtoMap);
const layers = this.setupLayers(layerMap, nodeMap, nodeDtoMap);
return [this.createRootLayer(), ...layers];
});
private createNodeDtoMap(): { [nodeId: string]: RoadmapNodeDTO } {
// Extract node map creation logic
}
private createMaps(nodeDtoMap: { [nodeId: string]: RoadmapNodeDTO }): {
layerMap: { [parentNodeId: string]: string[] },
clusterMap: { [clusterNodeId: string]: string[] },
nodeMap: { [nodeId: string]: RoadmapNode }
} {
// Extract maps creation logic
}
// Additional methods for other parts of the logic🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 103-103: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
[error] 158-158: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
[error] 177-177: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
* feat(client): appended svg-pan-zoom lib * feat(client): appended svg pan initialisation and customised buttons
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (4)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.ts (4)
78-78: Use the correct Angular property for component styles.In Angular, the correct property is
styleUrls(plural), notstyleUrl. UsingstyleUrlcan lead to build or runtime issues.- styleUrl: './feature-roadmap.component.scss', + styleUrls: ['./feature-roadmap.component.scss'],
169-169: Avoid spread syntax in a.reduce()accumulator for better performance.Constructing a new object on each iteration using spread (
...acc) is potentially O(n^2). Use a mutable approach (direct assignment) to improve performance.- (acc, node) => ({ ...acc, [node.id]: node }), + (acc, node) => { + acc[node.id] = node; + return acc; + },🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 169-169: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
224-224: Avoid spread syntax in a.reduce()accumulator for better performance.Same rationale: every iteration triggers a new object creation, leading to suboptimal time complexity.
- (acc, primaryNodeId) => ({ - ...acc, - [nodeDtoMap[primaryNodeId].previousNodeId || 'initialNode']: primaryNodeId, - }), + (acc, primaryNodeId) => { + acc[nodeDtoMap[primaryNodeId].previousNodeId || 'initialNode'] = primaryNodeId; + return acc; + },🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 224-224: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
243-243: Avoid spread syntax in a.reduce()accumulator for better performance.Repeated usage of spread on an accumulator can degrade performance at scale. Switching to direct assignment is more efficient.
- (acc, primaryNodeId) => ({ - ...acc, - [nodeDtoMap[primaryNodeId].previousNodeId || 'initialNode']: primaryNodeId, - }), + (acc, primaryNodeId) => { + acc[nodeDtoMap[primaryNodeId].previousNodeId || 'initialNode'] = primaryNodeId; + return acc; + },🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 243-243: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-svg-control.component.ts (2)
14-14: Remove thethis.notation in the template for readability.In Angular templates, referencing signal calls with
this.is unconventional. You can safely removethis.for brevity since it’s implicit in the template context.- <fast-svg [name]="this.iconName()" [size]="this.size()" /> + <fast-svg [name]="iconName()" [size]="size()" />
19-21: Rename the "event" property to avoid confusion.Using
eventas a property name can be confusing since it’s commonly associated with the DOMeventobject. Consider naming it something more descriptive, likeresizeAction, to clarify its purpose.- readonly event = input.required<EventType>(); + readonly resizeAction = input.required<EventType>(); - (click)="resizeRoadmap.emit(this.event())" + (click)="resizeRoadmap.emit(this.resizeAction())"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)
apps/blog/src/assets/icons/circle-center.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgapps/blog/src/assets/icons/zoom-in.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgapps/blog/src/assets/icons/zoom-out.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgapps/blog/src/assets/icons/zoom-reset.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.html(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.ts(1 hunks)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-svg-control.component.ts(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.html
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-svg-control.component.ts (1)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.ts (2)
Component(64-290)EventType(25-25)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.ts (4)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-cluster.component.ts (1)
Component(5-37)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-svg-control.component.ts (1)
Component(6-24)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-primary-node.component.ts (1)
Component(5-24)libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/ui/ui-roadmap-secondary-node.component.ts (1)
Component(5-24)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
libs/blog/roadmap/feature-roadmap/src/lib/feature-roadmap.component.ts
[error] 169-169: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
[error] 224-224: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
[error] 243-243: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)
66-66:✅ Verification successful
Confirm and verify the security status of the newly added package.
The addition of
"svg-pan-zoom": "^3.6.2"appears beneficial for the SVG pan-and-zoom functionality. However, let's make sure there are no known security advisories or deprecated versions.Please run the following script to check known vulnerabilities or advisories for this NPM package:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Query GitHub for security vulnerabilities related to the "svg-pan-zoom" package in the npm ecosystem gh api graphql -f query=' { securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "svg-pan-zoom") { nodes { advisory { summary severity publishedAt } vulnerableVersionRange firstPatchedVersion { identifier } } } }' 'Length of output: 462
Action: Verify Vulnerability Query for "svg-pan-zoom" Package
The initial security check for
"svg-pan-zoom": "^3.6.2"resulted in an empty vulnerabilities list but also produced a quoting error (unexpected EOF while looking for matching '\''), which prevents us from confidently confirming the package’s security status. Please re-run the query with corrected quoting or verify manually to ensure no vulnerabilities or deprecations exist. For instance, you can try this revised script:
- File: package.json, Line 66:
"svg-pan-zoom": "^3.6.2"- Next Steps:
• Re-run the above script (or an equivalent manual check) to verify that no vulnerabilities are reported for this package.
• Confirm that the query now returns a valid response (ideally with an empty nodes array) without any syntax errors.Once you’ve confirmed the security status manually, please update the review accordingly.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Revised script to query GitHub for known security vulnerabilities for the "svg-pan-zoom" package using a corrected quoting approach. gh api graphql -f query="$(cat <<'EOF' { securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "svg-pan-zoom") { nodes { advisory { summary severity publishedAt } vulnerableVersionRange firstPatchedVersion { identifier } } } } EOF )"Length of output: 473
Action: Confirm Package "svg-pan-zoom" Security Status
The GitHub GraphQL API query executed with the revised script returned an empty vulnerabilities list, indicating that no known security issues were found for
"svg-pan-zoom": "^3.6.2". Please ensure that this verification covers your security standards, but based on the query, the package appears secure for use.
- File: package.json, Line 66:
"svg-pan-zoom": "^3.6.2"
Summary by CodeRabbit