Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proof of continuous_bilinear #101

Merged

Conversation

Louis-Le-Grand
Copy link
Contributor

Proof of continuous_bilinear under the conditions that the modules A M and A N are free and finite. For this we added:

  • def LinearMap.smul₁ /.smul₂ the definition of left and right scalar multiplication
  • instance Module.instContinuousSMul show scalar multiplicationis Continuous
  • def LinearMap.prodfst /.prodsnd the definition of the projection of the product space on its components
  • instance Module.instCommAdd show addition is commutative
  • def LinearMap.basis₁ representation of object by there basis
  • lemma continuous_bilinear

@Louis-Le-Grand Louis-Le-Grand deleted the himworkshopmoduletopology branch June 13, 2024 13:05
@scholzhannah scholzhannah restored the himworkshopmoduletopology branch June 13, 2024 17:51
Copy link
Collaborator

@kbuzzard kbuzzard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't read the first big proof yet; I was hoping that it somehow wouldn't be necessary, but maybe it is. The issue seems to be that you want to consider two topologies on A even though they're the same :-/

@Louis-Le-Grand Louis-Le-Grand marked this pull request as draft June 14, 2024 14:11
@Louis-Le-Grand Louis-Le-Grand marked this pull request as draft June 14, 2024 14:11
@Louis-Le-Grand Louis-Le-Grand marked this pull request as ready for review June 14, 2024 16:28
@Louis-Le-Grand Louis-Le-Grand requested a review from kbuzzard June 14, 2024 16:28
Copy link
Collaborator

@kbuzzard kbuzzard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is looking great now! Well done! Tidy up any final bits, deal with the comments and I'll merge.

@Louis-Le-Grand Louis-Le-Grand requested a review from kbuzzard June 15, 2024 10:29
Copy link
Collaborator

@kbuzzard kbuzzard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We definitely don't want definitions which are already there, hopefully you can use what we have.

@kbuzzard
Copy link
Collaborator

One last thing: I am beginning to understand now that some results are true without assuming commutativity. Perhaps you should have a Ring section of the file where all the theorems that work fine without commutativity are proved in the correct generality, and then a CommRing section where the proofs which need commutativity go. So you'd have variables in each section, or you have some convention that all commutative top rings are called A and all noncommutative ones are called B or whatever.

Copy link
Collaborator

@kbuzzard kbuzzard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot!

@kbuzzard kbuzzard merged commit aed93c1 into ImperialCollegeLondon:main Jun 17, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants