Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP Classification theorem for GL0 #102

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

TBUGTB
Copy link
Contributor

@TBUGTB TBUGTB commented Jun 13, 2024

No description provided.

@kbuzzard
Copy link
Collaborator

I think that you should not be launching into a proof of bijectivity. In type theory this is an unnatural statement. You should inhabit the equiv instead, and probably comment out the aux lemma. You are basically doing the thing below the lemma, but within a proof, and what you're doing is sufficiently useful that it needs to be a standalone thing.

@TBUGTB
Copy link
Contributor Author

TBUGTB commented Jun 14, 2024

Thanks for the comment, I switched to proving an instance of Equiv. I also separated out the definition of a (constant) automorphic form because it's become quite long.

@kbuzzard
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks a lot! There seems to be some other stuff here too (in a totally different file), possibly I accidentally pushed to your branch after reviewing. Sorry! Your work looks fine :-)

@kbuzzard kbuzzard merged commit e10818d into ImperialCollegeLondon:main Jun 14, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants