docs: update example to showcase iterative review process

[LearningCircuit]

Summary

• Replace example PR link with a better demonstration (PR #1034)
• Add detailed explanation of why this example showcases the AI reviewer's value

What the New Example Demonstrates

• Critical bug detection: MODEL variable syntax error that would have silently failed
• Architecture improvements: CPU-base pattern adoption, 130 lines of duplication eliminated
• High-priority fixes: Breaking change warnings, curl overwrite warnings, platform-specific gaps, nvidia-smi verification
• Quality enhancements: Consistent formatting, better documentation
• Final approval: Shows the AI doesn't infinitely continue after issues are addressed

Why This Change

The new example better demonstrates real value - catching production bugs and forcing better architecture decisions, rather than just showing what a review looks like.

[github-actions]

AI Code Review

Documentation update that significantly improves example demonstration by showcasing concrete, measurable AI review outcomes rather than generic output.

🔒 Security

• No security concerns identified

Documentation Quality

• Strengths: Excellent value proposition with specific metrics (130 lines eliminated, critical bug types). Clear scannability via bolding. Effectively communicates iterative improvement process.
• Link Stability: Cannot verify PR #1034 comment ID 3508864021 permanence. If comment is edited/deleted, link breaks. Consider using PR-level link or archiving key excerpts.
• Claim Accuracy: Cannot verify from diff that all claimed improvements exist in the example. Inaccurate claims would reduce credibility.

Best Practices

• Inference (not verified): Linking to live PR comments creates maintenance burden. Inline examples or permalinks would be more robust.

✅ Approved with recommendations

---

Review by Friendly AI Reviewer - made with ❤️