Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Q65 & Q37 correct the answers #1

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Mahmoudgalalz
Copy link
Owner

about Q37 which is describe you already have a EC2 run as a database backup, so s3 is another service which can hold the backups but in this answer he is telling you what to use in an ec2, so EBS is a persistent storage even if the server is down you can attach this EBS to another EC2 to hold the same data before crash happens

Q65, its asking about the wrong of the third inbound rule and you can obviously connect to the ec2 if needed you can have the SSH opened in the another SG, so there's nothing wrong until the other security group not secure enough and about ssh you could be using a jump box (Bastion host).

PR Checklist

This PR is ready for review and meets the requirements set out
in Suggestion how to contribute

DOD

  • I have added new quiz{'s}
  • I have added new reference link{'s}
  • I have made small correction/improvements

Changes / Instructions

Add instructions to me, please type here, thanks

about Q37 which is describe you already have a EC2 run as a database backup, so s3 is another service which can hold the backups but in this answer he is telling you what to use in an ec2, so EBS is a persistent storage even if the server is down you can attach this EBS to another EC2 to hold the same data before crash happens

Q65, its asking about the wrong of the third inbound rule and you can obviously connect to the ec2 if needed you can have the SSH opened in the another SG, so there's nothing wrong until the other security group not secure enough and about ssh you could be using a jump box (Bastion host).
@Mahmoudgalalz Mahmoudgalalz added invalid This doesn't seem right question Further information is requested labels Jan 6, 2023
@Mahmoudgalalz Mahmoudgalalz self-assigned this Jan 6, 2023
@Mahmoudgalalz Mahmoudgalalz merged commit 908084a into master Jan 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
invalid This doesn't seem right question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant