fix: discard duplicate accounts on unlock #5775
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
7 tasks
|
@metamaskbot publish-preview |
|
Preview builds have been published. See these instructions for more information about preview builds. Expand for full list of packages and versions. |
mikesposito
force-pushed
the
mikesposito/fix/discard-duplicates
branch
from
956e6bf to
1341545
Compare
|
@metamaskbot publish-preview |
|
Preview builds have been published. See these instructions for more information about preview builds. Expand for full list of packages and versions. |
Co-authored-by: Mark Stacey <[email protected]>
mikesposito
force-pushed
the
mikesposito/fix/discard-duplicates
branch
from
524f070 to
b863dd5
Compare
ccharly
reviewed
May 13, 2025
Co-authored-by: Charly Chevalier <[email protected]>
|
@metamaskbot publish-preview |
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
runway-github bot
added a commit
to MetaMask/metamask-mobile
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
…15356) > [!WARNING] > This PR cherry pick needs to have the migrations modified, since we do not need migration 78,79,80 at release 7.47.0 <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Updating `@metamask/keyring-controller` to `^22.0.0`: ```markdown ## [22.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING** `keyringsMetadata` has been removed from the controller state ([#5725](MetaMask/core#5725)) - The metadata is now stored in each keyring object in the `state.keyrings` array. - When updating to this version, we recommend removing the `keyringsMetadata` state and all state referencing a keyring ID with a migration. New metadata will be generated for each keyring automatically after the update. ### Fixed - Keyrings with duplicate accounts are skipped as unsupported on unlock ([#5775](MetaMask/core#5775)) ``` and `@metamask/accounts-controller` to `^29.0.0`: ```markdown ## [29.0.0] ### Changed - **BREAKING:** bump `@metamask/keyring-controller` peer dependency to `^22.0.0` ([#5802](MetaMask/core#5802)) ``` ## **Related issues** Fixes: #15437 Fixes: #15316 Fixes: #15320 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Frederik Bolding <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Dependent on:
Explanation
It is no longer possible to persist duplicates in the vault, though users that already have duplicates will see them in the accounts list, and won't be able to do any action with their vault. These changes aim to discard duplicates, moving the keyring including a duplicate account to the unsupported array.
Can be tested on extension with MetaMask/metamask-extension#32621
References
Changelog
Checklist