fixup: name service use tokio::test instead of sim_test

...it seems to not work.

crates/sui-indexer-alt-e2e-tests/Cargo.toml

@@ -43,6 +43,5 @@ telemetry-subscribers.workspace = true
 
 move-core-types.workspace = true
 
-sui-macros.workspace = true
 sui-move-build.workspace = true
 sui-transactional-test-runner.workspace = true

crates/sui-indexer-alt-e2e-tests/tests/name_service_tests.rs

@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ use sui_indexer_alt_jsonrpc::{
     config::{NameServiceConfig, RpcConfig},
     data::system_package_task::SystemPackageTaskArgs,
 };
-use sui_macros::sim_test;
 use sui_move_build::BuildConfig;
 use sui_types::{
     base_types::{ObjectID, SuiAddress},
@@ -67,7 +66,7 @@ macro_rules! assert_invalid_params {
 }
 
 /// Test resolving a simple domain name, using both formats.
-#[sim_test]
+#[tokio::test]
 async fn test_resolve_domain() {
     let mut c = SuiNSCluster::new().await;
 
@@ -86,7 +85,7 @@ async fn test_resolve_domain() {
 }
 
 /// If a domain name exists but has no target, we can't resolve it, but it's not an error.
-#[sim_test]
+#[tokio::test]
 async fn test_resolve_domain_no_target() {
     let mut c = SuiNSCluster::new().await;
 
@@ -106,7 +105,7 @@ async fn test_resolve_domain_no_target() {
 
 /// Set-up a domain with an expiry, and confirm that it exists, then advance time on-chain until it
 /// expires and confirm that the RPC no longer resolves the domain.
-#[sim_test]
+#[tokio::test]
 async fn test_resolve_domain_expiry() {
     let mut c = SuiNSCluster::new().await;
 
@@ -130,7 +129,7 @@ async fn test_resolve_domain_expiry() {
     c.cluster.stopped().await;
 }
 
-#[sim_test]
+#[tokio::test]
 async fn test_resolve_nonexistent_domain() {
     let mut c = SuiNSCluster::new().await;
     c.cluster.create_checkpoint().await.unwrap();
@@ -142,7 +141,7 @@ async fn test_resolve_nonexistent_domain() {
 
 /// Test resolving a valid sub-domain (which requires both the sub-domain and its parent to exist
 /// in the registry).
-#[sim_test]
+#[tokio::test]
 async fn test_resolve_subdomain() {
     let mut c = SuiNSCluster::new().await;
 
@@ -166,7 +165,7 @@ async fn test_resolve_subdomain() {
 }
 
 /// Like the parent domain case, but a sub-domain's expiry is controlled by its parent's expiry
-#[sim_test]
+#[tokio::test]
 async fn test_resolve_subdomain_parent_expiry() {
     let mut c = SuiNSCluster::new().await;
 
@@ -195,7 +194,7 @@ async fn test_resolve_subdomain_parent_expiry() {
 }
 
 /// A sub-domain that has its own expiry, in addition to (and before) the parent's expiry.
-#[sim_test]
+#[tokio::test]
 async fn test_resolve_subdomain_expiry() {
     let mut c = SuiNSCluster::new().await;
 
@@ -227,7 +226,7 @@ async fn test_resolve_subdomain_expiry() {
 
 /// A sub-domain where the parent domain's NFT is different from the sub-domain's NFT, is
 /// considered expired -- its parent has been bought by someone else.
-#[sim_test]
+#[tokio::test]
 async fn test_resolve_subdomain_bad_parent() {
     let mut c = SuiNSCluster::new().await;
 
@@ -253,7 +252,7 @@ async fn test_resolve_subdomain_bad_parent() {
 }
 
 /// The parent domain record does not exist, so the sub-domain is considered expired.
-#[sim_test]
+#[tokio::test]
 async fn test_resolve_subdomain_no_parent() {
     let mut c = SuiNSCluster::new().await;