Skip to content

Fix unused global warnings from new flake8 7.2.0 #1609

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 2, 2025
Merged

Fix unused global warnings from new flake8 7.2.0 #1609

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
320a65f
Fix unused global warnings from new flake8 7.2.0
parthosa Apr 1, 2025
ba09b90
signoff
parthosa Apr 1, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions user_tools/src/spark_rapids_pytools/common/sys_storage.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Copyright (c) 2023-2024, NVIDIA CORPORATION.
# Copyright (c) 2023-2025, NVIDIA CORPORATION.
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ def gen_dir_tree(cls,
dir_count = 0

def inner(dir_p: pathlib.Path, prefix: str = '', level=-1):
nonlocal files_count, dir_count, dir_patterns, file_patterns
nonlocal files_count, dir_count
Copy link
Collaborator

@amahussein amahussein Apr 1, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see dir_patterns and file_patterns are being used.
I guess it is because it is nort needed to be redefined as non_local.

Would this work for python 3.9+?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@parthosa parthosa Apr 1, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is correct. Since these are read-only variables (defined in the outer function), we do not need them to be non_local.

Yes, all tox tests passed for python versions 3.9-3.12.

Copy link
Collaborator

@amahussein amahussein Apr 2, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AFAIK, Tox is not a 100% reliable way to tell because if the unit-tests do not cover that path, we won't know that something is wrong in runtime.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@parthosa parthosa Apr 2, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. That is true. In this case, I think it should be fine because these variables are read-only and these variables can be safely read in the inner function.

if not level:
return # 0, stop iterating
sub_items = []
Expand Down