DesignSpecification:ZoneHVAC:Sizing and Sizing:System docs fixes#11431
DesignSpecification:ZoneHVAC:Sizing and Sizing:System docs fixes#11431
Conversation
doc/input-output-reference/src/overview/group-design-objects.tex
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
doc/input-output-reference/src/overview/group-design-objects.tex
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
doc/input-output-reference/src/overview/group-design-objects.tex
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
I did some local testing using AirflowNetwork_MultiZone_House_OvercoolDehumid.idf (which contains both AirLoopHVAC:UnitaryHeatCool and Sizing:System objects), and indeed this bugfix seems to do what we want: Nominal Heating Capacity for AirLoopHVAC:UnitaryHeatCool now takes into account However, it doesn't appear any of the existing unit or regression tests cover this particular situation. Is local testing enough, or should I introduce a new unit test or sample file? |
|
A unit tests is probably preferred, though if you're able to modify the AirflowNetwork_MultiZone_House_OvercoolDehumid.idf test file without sacrificing other aspects, then that may also be an option. |
…d.idf so we can test Sizing:System autosized heating fraction with AirLoopHVAC:UnitaryHeatCool.
|
|
…design day sentence for applicable Sizing:System fields.
|
|
|
@rraustad @joseph-robertson is everyone happy here? |
|
Code Integrity check on CppCheck looks unrelated. Otherwise everyone is happy. |
mitchute
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Docs build locally and the other test failures are unrelated. Merging.
Pull request overview
Description of the purpose of this PR
Pull Request Author
Reviewer