Skip to content

Fix Coil:Cooling:DX cannot mimic Coil:Cooling:DX:MultiSpeed PLF > 1 behavior#11448

Draft
joseph-robertson wants to merge 7 commits intodevelopfrom
coil-cooling-dx-plf
Draft

Fix Coil:Cooling:DX cannot mimic Coil:Cooling:DX:MultiSpeed PLF > 1 behavior#11448
joseph-robertson wants to merge 7 commits intodevelopfrom
coil-cooling-dx-plf

Conversation

@joseph-robertson
Copy link
Collaborator

@joseph-robertson joseph-robertson commented Mar 5, 2026

Pull request overview

Description of the purpose of this PR

Pull Request Author

  • Title of PR should be user-synopsis style (clearly understandable in a standalone changelog context)
  • Label the PR with at least one of: Defect, Refactoring, NewFeature, Performance, and/or DoNoPublish
  • Pull requests that impact EnergyPlus code must also include unit tests to cover enhancement or defect repair
  • Author should provide a "walkthrough" of relevant code changes using a GitHub code review comment process
  • If any diffs are expected, author must demonstrate they are justified using plots and descriptions
  • If changes fix a defect, the fix should be demonstrated in plots and descriptions
  • If any defect files are updated to a more recent version, upload new versions here or on DevSupport
  • If IDD requires transition, transition source, rules, ExpandObjects, and IDFs must be updated, and add IDDChange label
  • If structural output changes, add to output rules file and add OutputChange label
  • If adding/removing any LaTeX docs or figures, update that document's CMakeLists file dependencies
  • If adding/removing any output files (e.g., eplustbl.*)
    • Update ..\scripts\Epl-run.bat
    • Update ..\scripts\RunEPlus.bat
    • Update ..\src\EPLaunch\ MainModule.bas, epl-ui.frm, and epl.vbp (VersionComments)
    • Update ...github\workflows\energyplus.py

Reviewer

  • Perform a Code Review on GitHub
  • If branch is behind develop, merge develop and build locally to check for side effects of the merge
  • If defect, verify by running develop branch and reproducing defect, then running PR and reproducing fix
  • If feature, test running new feature, try creative ways to break it
  • CI status: all green or justified
  • Check that performance is not impacted (CI Linux results include performance check)
  • Run Unit Test(s) locally
  • Check any new function arguments for performance impacts
  • Verify IDF naming conventions and styles, memos and notes and defaults
  • If new idf included, locally check the err file and other outputs

@joseph-robertson joseph-robertson self-assigned this Mar 5, 2026
@joseph-robertson joseph-robertson added the Defect Includes code to repair a defect in EnergyPlus label Mar 5, 2026
OpModePower = thisspeed.fullLoadPower * speedRatio;
} else {
OpModePower = thisspeed.fullLoadPower * thisspeed.RTF;
}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So either multiply by PLR when NOT including startup losses or use RTF when including startup losses. That does seem correct. And only do this for speeds > 1 because at low speed the compressor will obviously cycle on and off. To save me some investigation time, why is line 424 different (i.e., doesn't check for speedNum)?

@@ -24,6 +24,12 @@ See pull request [#11366](https://github.com/NatLabRockies/EnergyPlus/pull/11366

# Object Change: ObjectStartsWithC

# Object Change: Coil:Cooling:DX:CurveFit:OperatingMode

Insert new field A2 which is also TODO, "Apply Part Load Fraction to Speeds Greater than 1", defaulted to blank
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't this TODONE?

\type choice
\key Yes
\key No
\default Yes
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was thinking that the default should be the same as the Multispeed object and the transition could insert Yes. What do you think?

Coil:Cooling:DX:MultiSpeed,
    A9 , \field Apply Part Load Fraction to Speeds Greater than 1
       \type choice
       \key Yes
       \key No
       \default No

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree that No should be the default. And I personally think the transition should use the default (even though it will result in diffs), but I can see arguments for both sides.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would not have a problem with using the default of No.

@mitchute mitchute added this to the EnergyPlus 26.2 IOFreeze milestone Mar 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Defect Includes code to repair a defect in EnergyPlus

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Coil:Cooling:DX cannot mimic Coil:Cooling:DX:MultiSpeed PLF > 1 behavior

5 participants