Skip to content

Conversation

@jkopanski
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@jkopanski jkopanski marked this pull request as ready for review October 4, 2024 11:44
@jkopanski jkopanski requested a review from Ferinko October 4, 2024 11:44
Copy link
Collaborator

@Julek Julek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See comments

symm
aesop_spec

def preservesEvm (s₀ : State) (s₁ : State) : Prop :=
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this predicate should also compare evm states in the case where the second state is a Checkpoint no? 🙂

@jkopanski jkopanski requested a review from Julek October 8, 2024 10:50
rw [preserved_def] at h
exact h.2.2.1

def mono_keccak_map {evm evm' : EVMState} (h : preserved evm evm') :
Copy link
Collaborator

@Ferinko Ferinko Oct 8, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just a projection function, it's not a monotonicity statement. It says that you can take out the last component of and.

The thing that you will need at some point is stuff like: insert is monotonic in its second argument given the preorder on your maps, i.e.:
m1 <= m2 -> insert x m1 <= insert x m2.

@jkopanski jkopanski requested a review from Ferinko October 8, 2024 12:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants