Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

toolong: 1.4.0 -> 1.5.0 #388011

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 9, 2025
Merged

toolong: 1.4.0 -> 1.5.0 #388011

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 9, 2025

Conversation

Sigmanificient
Copy link
Member

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

Copy link
Contributor

@polygon polygon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The version update is fine. However, this fails to start for me (though that is also true for the version in nixpkgs already), likely due to #360671.

I've found this PR: Textualize/toolong#63 and condensed the relevant parts into a patch which I uploaded here: polygon@e438c8e

This should apply right on top of your PR and fix the package. Could you possibly verify this and apply it to this PR?

@Sigmanificient
Copy link
Member Author

Sigmanificient commented Mar 8, 2025

image

@polygon

@Sigmanificient Sigmanificient requested a review from polygon March 8, 2025 14:47
Copy link
Contributor

@polygon polygon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Builds and works. Approved!

@wegank wegank added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person label Mar 8, 2025
@Mindavi
Copy link
Contributor

Mindavi commented Mar 9, 2025

Unfortunate that upstream did not tag properly. Maybe ask if they still want to do so.

@Mindavi Mindavi merged commit 8adda98 into NixOS:master Mar 9, 2025
28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants