nushell: 0.106.1 -> 0.107.0, nushellPlugins.*: update #439871

VuiMuich · 2025-09-03T14:23:49Z

https://www.nushell.sh/blog/2025-09-02-nushell_0_107_0.html

Update plugins:

hcl
semver
skim

Mark plugin packages as broken:

highlight
units

closes #439911

Resolved #450157

Things done

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

VuiMuich · 2025-09-03T15:27:31Z

`nixpkgs-review` result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 439871
Commit: 06e88d7e805091d941c442f7ab37e5dd0d2836b8

`x86_64-linux`

✅ 6 packages built:

nushell
nushellPlugins.formats
nushellPlugins.gstat
nushellPlugins.polars
nushellPlugins.query
tests.writers.simple.nu

timon-schelling · 2025-09-03T17:24:38Z

I’d prefer to wait a little while so the plugins have time to update, and we won’t need to mark them all as broken.

This PR could also include plugin updates.
See comment above nushell version.

dtomvan · 2025-09-03T18:02:56Z

I agree, but there are a bunch of plugins that don't update regularly, or look at PRs frequently enough.

For example:

timon-schelling · 2025-09-03T18:13:43Z

We could decide to patch them. Trivial when only a version bump is needed and could be automated.

But for now, maybe wait a week or two.

YPares · 2025-09-06T23:58:28Z

@timon-schelling You mean plugins that are present in nixpkgs too? Because for other plugins it makes little sense to delay the merge, or even prevent breakage as users may just opt to stick to an older nixpkgs-unstable commit if they need compat with external tools. Also two weeks is basically half the development cycle of nushell.

timon-schelling · 2025-09-07T02:06:53Z

@timon-schelling You mean plugins that are present in nixpkgs too? Because for other plugins it makes little sense to delay the merge, or even prevent breakage as users may just opt to stick to an older nixpkgs-unstable commit if they need compat with external tools. Also two weeks is basically half the development cycle of nushell.

Yes plugins in nixpkgs nushellPlugins.*.
I agree that we need a way to merge new nushell version relatively fast. Patching nu_plugin crate version should work for some plugins and some nushell updates.
I wanted to work on automating that but did not find time to do that last few days.

Anyways all plugins that break should be marked that way.
And plugins that have a compatible version should, in my opinion, be updated in this PR.

VuiMuich · 2025-09-07T08:51:34Z

I mean generally I can bump all the plugins to their respective latest version, but tbh it feels a bit out of scope for this PR imo, especially for plugins that need patching since the upstream repo is way behind.
Also I am not familar with using plugins in nushell at all, so I have no means to test.

If you strictly want to bump nushell and the plugins in one go, feel free to open a superseding PR that closes mine.
I just wanted 0.107.0 in asap to have the "immediate accept" feature.

VuiMuich · 2025-09-07T09:31:59Z

Ok, of all the plugins that (potentially) requiriere an update, only semver and skim had a recent release that was not yet taken care of by other PRs so I'll include them here.

Those plugins should be fine as they already derive their version from the nushell package as far as my understanding goes:

formats
gstat
polars
query

These packages are updated here or in other PRs:

desktop_notifications nushellPlugins.desktop_notifications: 0.106.1 -> 0.108.0 #439792
semver nushell: 0.106.1 -> 0.107.0, nushellPlugins.*: update #439871
skim nushell: 0.106.1 -> 0.107.0, nushellPlugins.*: update #439871

Already marked as broken are:

dbus
net

That leaves:

hcl
highlight
units
I have no idea if they are actually incompatible to 0.107.0. If someone can report on this, I can mark those as broken as well, otherwise I would like to keep those three out of this PR.

dtomvan · 2025-09-07T12:44:03Z

Also I am not familar with using plugins in nushell at all, so I have no means to test.

I've included a test for each plugin, so you can build nushellPlugins.foo.passthru.tests.loadCheck to test if they work with the current nushell. Here's the command I use to get a nice overview of what does and doesn't work:

NIXPKGS_ALLOW_BROKEN=1 nom-build -E \
  'with import ./. { config.allowAliases = false; };
   lib.mapAttrs
   (_n: p: p.tests.loadCheck)
   (lib.filterAttrs (_n: lib.isDerivation) nushellPlugins)' \
   --keep-going

I have no idea if they are actually incompatible to 0.107.0. If someone can report on this, I can mark those as broken as well, otherwise I would like to keep those three out of this PR.

Generally, every nushell update the plugins become incompatible. They need to be compiled against the exact same version of the API. So you could mark hcl,highlight,units as broken for now so we can call it a day and merge this.

I might figure out a way to patch the plugin sources every update, but it would be better if plugin authors could test and release quickly after a new release of nushell... but from what I've seen nobody is really doing that proactively at all...

VuiMuich · 2025-09-07T14:18:39Z

I hope this desirable to have the "mark broken" as dedicated commit, or should I squash it into the nushell update commit?

Also should I update the PR title? I didn't do that yet, as it would become awkwardly long.

Yethal · 2025-09-07T14:23:55Z

Give me a few hours, I'll release updated version of the hcl plugin and we'll add it to the pr

YPares · 2025-09-07T14:25:46Z

Generally, every nushell update the plugins become incompatible.

Yep, and for this reason I was surprised to see other plugins being added here, besides the main ones maintained by the nushell team and released in sync with nushell. I don't see the point of adding them to nixpkgs if they are likely to become broken one month later.

from what I've seen nobody is really doing that proactively at all

There are plans for improving plugins compat throughout several nushell version, but for now we have to live with that.

koffydrop · 2025-09-07T19:08:50Z

`nixpkgs-review` result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 439871
Commit: 913f6e3f6709951d5ec4be050369c7d20fc1d834

`x86_64-linux`

✅ 8 packages built:

nushell
nushellPlugins.formats
nushellPlugins.gstat
nushellPlugins.polars
nushellPlugins.query
nushellPlugins.semver
nushellPlugins.skim
tests.writers.simple.nu

VuiMuich · 2025-09-10T15:19:36Z

`nixpkgs-review` result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 439871
Commit: fde9024da3bb53674ea77115b7575020cc990edc

`x86_64-linux`

✅ 9 packages built:

nushell
nushellPlugins.formats
nushellPlugins.gstat
nushellPlugins.hcl
nushellPlugins.polars
nushellPlugins.query
nushellPlugins.semver
nushellPlugins.skim
tests.writers.simple.nu

poliorcetics · 2025-09-12T20:13:19Z

`nixpkgs-review` result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 439871
Commit: fde9024da3bb53674ea77115b7575020cc990edc

`aarch64-darwin`

✅ 8 packages built:

nushell
nushellPlugins.formats
nushellPlugins.gstat
nushellPlugins.hcl
nushellPlugins.polars
nushellPlugins.query
nushellPlugins.skim
tests.writers.simple.nu

jasonxue1 · 2025-09-13T02:27:08Z

can you resolve #439911 here?

VuiMuich · 2025-09-13T03:46:06Z

can you resolve #439911 here?

Yes, it already does.

koffydrop · 2025-09-13T19:32:46Z

`nixpkgs-review` result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 439871
Commit: fde9024da3bb53674ea77115b7575020cc990edc

`x86_64-linux`

✅ 9 packages built:

nushell
nushellPlugins.formats
nushellPlugins.gstat
nushellPlugins.hcl
nushellPlugins.polars
nushellPlugins.query
nushellPlugins.semver
nushellPlugins.skim
tests.writers.simple.nu

nixos-discourse · 2025-09-15T07:44:43Z

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-already-reviewed/2617/2546

FlameFlag · 2025-09-23T17:37:49Z

`nixpkgs-review` result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 439871
Commit: fde9024da3bb53674ea77115b7575020cc990edc

`x86_64-darwin`

✅ 8 packages built:

nushell
nushellPlugins.formats
nushellPlugins.gstat
nushellPlugins.hcl
nushellPlugins.polars
nushellPlugins.query
nushellPlugins.skim
tests.writers.simple.nu

`aarch64-darwin`

✅ 8 packages built:

nushell
nushellPlugins.formats
nushellPlugins.gstat
nushellPlugins.hcl
nushellPlugins.polars
nushellPlugins.query
nushellPlugins.skim
tests.writers.simple.nu

VuiMuich · 2025-10-02T05:57:04Z

@Aleksanaa sorry to ping you explicitly, but you have been helpful getting dragging PRs over the finish line in the past.
Would you be so kind to give this a cursory look and if aok merge?

jasonxue1 · 2025-10-12T11:21:15Z

Could you add this:
Resolved #450157

SigmaSquadron

Diff looks good, and it seems this was extensively tested.

oscarvarto · 2025-10-15T01:42:05Z

Yay 🥳

VuiMuich · 2025-10-15T04:13:44Z

Tanks for the merge @SigmaSquadron!

GustavoWidman · 2025-10-16T17:03:02Z

merged just in time for 0.108 😭

VuiMuich · 2025-10-16T18:03:56Z

I am glad it was merged just before the release and I didn't need to update the PR 😅

nushell: 0.106.1 -> 0.107.0

06e88d7

nixpkgs-ci bot added 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Darwin. labels Sep 3, 2025

nix-owners bot requested review from Br1ght0ne, JoaquinTrinanes, JohnTitor and ryan4yin September 3, 2025 14:29

VuiMuich mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2025

nushellPlugins.desktop_notifications: 0.106.1 -> 0.108.0 #439792

Closed

dtomvan mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2025

Update Request: nu_plugin_skim 0.17.0 → 0.19.0 #439911

Closed

3 tasks

nushellPlugins.semver: 0.11.6 -> 0.11.7

c250280

nix-owners bot requested a review from koffydrop September 7, 2025 09:15

nushellPlugins.skim: 0.17.0 -> 0.19.0

3119568

VuiMuich changed the title ~~nushell: 0.106.1 -> 0.107.0~~ nushell: 0.106.1 -> 0.107.0, nushellPlugins.semver: 0.11.6 -> 0.11.7, nushellPlugins.skim: 0.17.0 -> 0.19.0 Sep 7, 2025

nix-owners bot requested a review from aftix September 7, 2025 09:37

nix-owners bot requested review from Yethal and mgttlinger September 7, 2025 14:22

koffydrop approved these changes Sep 7, 2025

View reviewed changes

nixpkgs-ci bot added 12.approvals: 2 This PR was reviewed and approved by two persons. and removed 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. labels Sep 10, 2025

timon-schelling approved these changes Sep 13, 2025

View reviewed changes

nixpkgs-ci bot added 12.approvals: 3+ This PR was reviewed and approved by three or more persons. and removed 12.approvals: 2 This PR was reviewed and approved by two persons. labels Sep 13, 2025

jasonxue1 requested review from Yethal and koffydrop September 13, 2025 02:25

Yethal approved these changes Sep 13, 2025

View reviewed changes

koffydrop approved these changes Sep 13, 2025

View reviewed changes

FlameFlag approved these changes Sep 23, 2025

View reviewed changes

Yethal mentioned this pull request Oct 9, 2025

Update Request: nushell 0.106.1 → 0.107.0 #450157

Closed

3 tasks

JohnTitor approved these changes Oct 9, 2025

View reviewed changes

SigmaSquadron approved these changes Oct 15, 2025

View reviewed changes

SigmaSquadron added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 15, 2025

Merged via the queue into NixOS:master with commit c83d7a2 Oct 15, 2025
36 checks passed

VuiMuich deleted the nushell-0.107.0 branch October 15, 2025 05:56

Uh oh!

nushell: 0.106.1 -> 0.107.0, nushellPlugins.*: update #439871

nushell: 0.106.1 -> 0.107.0, nushellPlugins.*: update #439871

Uh oh!

Conversation

VuiMuich commented Sep 3, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Things done

Uh oh!

VuiMuich commented Sep 3, 2025

nixpkgs-review result

x86_64-linux

Uh oh!

timon-schelling commented Sep 3, 2025

Uh oh!

dtomvan commented Sep 3, 2025

Uh oh!

timon-schelling commented Sep 3, 2025

Uh oh!

YPares commented Sep 6, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

timon-schelling commented Sep 7, 2025

Uh oh!

VuiMuich commented Sep 7, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

VuiMuich commented Sep 7, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

dtomvan commented Sep 7, 2025

Uh oh!

VuiMuich commented Sep 7, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Yethal commented Sep 7, 2025

Uh oh!

YPares commented Sep 7, 2025

Uh oh!

koffydrop commented Sep 7, 2025

nixpkgs-review result

x86_64-linux

Uh oh!

VuiMuich commented Sep 10, 2025

nixpkgs-review result

x86_64-linux

Uh oh!

poliorcetics commented Sep 12, 2025

nixpkgs-review result

aarch64-darwin

Uh oh!

jasonxue1 commented Sep 13, 2025

Uh oh!

VuiMuich commented Sep 13, 2025

Uh oh!

koffydrop commented Sep 13, 2025

nixpkgs-review result

x86_64-linux

Uh oh!

nixos-discourse commented Sep 15, 2025

Uh oh!

FlameFlag commented Sep 23, 2025

nixpkgs-review result

x86_64-darwin

aarch64-darwin

Uh oh!

VuiMuich commented Oct 2, 2025

Uh oh!

jasonxue1 commented Oct 12, 2025

Uh oh!

SigmaSquadron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

oscarvarto commented Oct 15, 2025

Uh oh!

VuiMuich commented Oct 15, 2025

Uh oh!

GustavoWidman commented Oct 16, 2025

Uh oh!

VuiMuich commented Sep 3, 2025 •

edited

Loading

`nixpkgs-review` result

`x86_64-linux`

YPares commented Sep 6, 2025 •

edited

Loading

VuiMuich commented Sep 7, 2025 •

edited

Loading

VuiMuich commented Sep 7, 2025 •

edited

Loading

VuiMuich commented Sep 7, 2025 •

edited

Loading

`nixpkgs-review` result

`x86_64-linux`

`nixpkgs-review` result

`x86_64-linux`

`nixpkgs-review` result

`aarch64-darwin`

`nixpkgs-review` result

`x86_64-linux`

`nixpkgs-review` result

`x86_64-darwin`

`aarch64-darwin`