Refactor log.fnl to remove aniseed nvim module #636
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Olical
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2025
| (tset vim.wo win :foldmarker (.. (config.get-in [:log :fold :marker :start]) | ||
| "," | ||
| (config.get-in [:log :fold :marker :end]))) | ||
| (tset vim.wo win :foldlevel 0)) |
| @@ -515,10 +504,9 @@ | |||
| (on-new-log-buf (upsert-buf))) | |||
|
|
|||
| (fn reset-hard [] | |||
| (nvim.ex.bwipeout_ (upsert-buf))) | |||
| (vim.api.nvim_buf_delete (upsert-buf) {:force true})) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh this is equivalent? Interesting!
|
Works fine 🎉 |
|
Yes now a lot of equivalents for the viml functions are available through the I will be back... |
|
Sweet, well thank you for sharing and upgrading the code 😄 this is very much appreciated, thank you for your efforts! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ok this is a revised #634. It shouldn't have any regressions