Move GEMM benchmark to nanobench#4027
Open
Mousius wants to merge 2 commits intoOpenMathLib:developfrom
Open
Conversation
This is a proof of concept, for moving the benchmark suite to use [nanobench](https://github.com/martinus/nanobench.git), which is a single header file but gives some great advantages over the existing benchmark suite: * Robustness - nanobench will explicitly tell you when benchmarks are unstable, and offer some guidance to help stabilise them. * JSON Output - this should allow us to store the results in a more machine friendly format, in future we can integrate this into CI to do checks on PRs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a proof of concept, for moving the benchmark suite to use nanobench, which is a single header file but has advantages over the existing benchmark suite:
I also looked at Google Benchmark and Catch2, but nanobench was more appealing due to minimal integration requirements with the existing hybrid build architecture.