[Components] agility_cms #13864 #13957
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce several new actions for the Agility CMS integration, allowing users to retrieve content items, content models, and specific item details. Enhancements to the Changes
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (6)
- components/agility_cms/actions/get-content-items/get-content-items.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agility_cms/actions/get-content-models/get-content-models.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agility_cms/actions/get-item/get-item.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agility_cms/agility_cms.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agility_cms/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agility_cms/package.json (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (19)
components/agility_cms/package.json (1)
3-3: LGTM!The version increment from
0.0.1to0.1.0follows semantic versioning and suggests the addition of new backward-compatible functionalities.components/agility_cms/actions/get-content-models/get-content-models.mjs (4)
1-1: LGTM!The import statement is syntactically correct and the relative path to the
agility_cms.app.mjsmodule is valid, assuming the file exists at that location.
3-21: LGTM!The exported default object follows the correct structure for defining an action. The metadata properties provide relevant information, and the
appobject is correctly specified as a dependency. The async run method is defined correctly.
12-20: LGTM!The async run method is implemented correctly. It destructures the
$object, calls thegetContentModelsmethod fromthis.app, awaits the response, exports a summary, and returns the response object. This allows the caller to access the retrieved content models and provides feedback to the user.
17-17: Verify the structure of theresponseobject.The summary message assumes that the
responseobject has content models as its top-level keys. Please ensure that the structure of theresponseobject returned bythis.app.getContentModelsmatches this assumption. If the content models are nested within theresponseobject, you may need to adjust the way you calculate the count.components/agility_cms/actions/get-content-items/get-content-items.mjs (2)
3-17: LGTM!The action definition looks good:
- The key, name, and description provide a clear purpose and documentation link for users.
- The version is appropriately set for a new action.
- The type is correctly set to "action".
- The props are correctly defined, including the app instance and the locale parameter.
18-27: LGTM!The
runmethod looks good:
- It is correctly defined as an asynchronous function.
- The
getItemsfunction is called with the correct parameters.- The summary export enhances user feedback by indicating the number of items retrieved.
- Returning the response allows further processing or usage downstream.
components/agility_cms/actions/get-item/get-item.mjs (4)
1-2: LGTM!The import statement is syntactically correct and assumes the existence of the
agility_cms.app.mjsfile.
3-26: LGTM!The exported object correctly defines the action's metadata and properties. The properties are properly defined using the
propDefinitionsyntax, and theitemIdproperty correctly depends on thelocaleproperty.
27-32: LGTM!The
runmethod is correctly defined as an async function and calls thegetItemmethod with the required parameters. The$object is properly destructured from the input, and theapp,locale, anditemIdproperties are accessed usingthis, ensuring the correct scope.
34-36: LGTM!The code correctly exports a summary message using the
$.exportmethod, providing useful information about the retrieved item's content ID. Theresponseobject is properly returned, allowing further processing of the retrieved data.components/agility_cms/agility_cms.app.mjs (7)
8-14: LGTM!The
localeproperty is well-defined with a clear description, appropriate default value, and options sourced from constants.
15-31: LGTM!The
itemIdproperty is well-defined with a clear description and an asynchronous options function that fetches item IDs based on the selected locale. The options function is implemented correctly, retrieving items using thegetItemsmethod and formatting the results into a value-label pair for selection.
34-36: LGTM!The
_baseUrlmethod is implemented correctly, constructing the base URL for API requests using the required authentication data from the$authobject. The template literal syntax is used appropriately to concatenate the URL segments.
37-52: LGTM!The
_makeRequestmethod is implemented correctly, streamlining API calls by automatically including the API key in the headers. The method extracts the necessary options from theoptsargument using object destructuring, constructs the URL by calling the_baseUrlmethod, and calls theaxiosfunction with the appropriate URL and headers. The API key is included in the headers using the$authobject. The method returns the result of theaxioscall, allowing for further processing of the API response.
53-58: LGTM!The
getContentModelsmethod is implemented correctly, retrieving content models from the API. It calls the_makeRequestmethod with the appropriate "/contentmodels" path and spreads any additional arguments into the call, allowing for flexibility in the API request. The method returns the result of the_makeRequestcall, which should contain the retrieved content models.
59-66: LGTM!The
getItemsmethod is implemented correctly, retrieving items from the API based on the specified locale. It extracts thelocaleargument and spreads any additional arguments using object destructuring. The_makeRequestmethod is called with the appropriate path, which includes thelocaleparameter, and any additional arguments are spread into the call, allowing for flexibility in the API request. The method returns the result of the_makeRequestcall, which should contain the retrieved items for the specified locale.
67-73: LGTM!The
getItemmethod is implemented correctly, retrieving a specific item from the API based on the specified locale and item ID. It extracts thelocaleanditemIdarguments and spreads any additional arguments using object destructuring. The_makeRequestmethod is called with the appropriate path, which includes thelocaleanditemIdparameters, and any additional arguments are spread into the call, allowing for flexibility in the API request. The method returns the result of the_makeRequestcall, which should contain the retrieved item details for the specified locale and item ID.components/agility_cms/common/constants.mjs (1)
1-308: LGTM!The
constants.mjsfile looks good:
- It exports a default object with a
LOCALE_OPTIONSproperty.LOCALE_OPTIONSis an array of objects, each representing a locale option with avalue(locale code) andlabel(human-readable name).- The list of locale options is comprehensive, covering a wide range of languages and regions.
- The structure and syntax of the code are consistent and follow the described format.
- The locale codes used for the
valueproperty adhere to the standard format.- The
labelproperty provides user-friendly names for each locale, combining the language and region.- The list appears to be alphabetically sorted based on the locale code, which is a good practice.
This constants file provides a centralized location for defining supported locales, making it easy to import and use across the codebase for localization purposes. The comprehensive list of locales enables broad international support.
I don't see any issues or potential problems with this code. Great job!
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores