Skip to content

adding new qcip ep6 text for review #3695

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

christopherporter1
Copy link
Collaborator

Adding the text component of QCiP ep 6 on simulating nature. Still needs technical review.

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for contributing to Qiskit documentation!

Before your PR can be merged, it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient. Thanks! 🙌

Copy link
Collaborator

@0sophy1 0sophy1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @christopherporter1 , Thank you for the greate content. I pushed an update for the fore part before the utility scale paper replication and please review and feel free to merge that.

#3709

@christopherporter1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@0sophy1 Thanks for the outstanding review of the existing part! Regarding reproducing the utility calculation, I don't think we want to spend too much time on that in this lesson, because it is done in great detail already here. It would be best to refer them to that full treatment. That's what I think Olivia intended, anyway. It was her content; I was just formatting it.

@0sophy1
Copy link
Collaborator

0sophy1 commented Aug 13, 2025

@0sophy1 Thanks for the outstanding review of the existing part! Regarding reproducing the utility calculation, I don't think we want to spend too much time on that in this lesson, because it is done in great detail already here. It would be best to refer them to that full treatment. That's what I think Olivia intended, anyway. It was her content; I was just formatting it.

great! so my push is about this PR, so please feel free to merge updates.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants