Skip to content

[GO Feedback] Allow custom tasks during finals #952

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
LeroyR opened this issue Mar 18, 2025 · 3 comments
Closed

[GO Feedback] Allow custom tasks during finals #952

LeroyR opened this issue Mar 18, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@LeroyR
Copy link
Member

LeroyR commented Mar 18, 2025

If Teams are able to show other tasks that they think should be included in egpsr they could bring them up during the Team Leader meetings and the task score will be decided on-site by the TC. Any used Items must be provided to all teams.

Example of useful skills not present in the rulebook:

  • Robot is able to water the plants. (The Team provides some watering cans for the Arena and the task is added to the final.)
  • Finding and cleaning up a spill on the Table.
  • Pouring and delivering a drink.
@ARTenshi
Copy link
Collaborator

Sounds good as long as referees can be sure no hardcoded or scripted tasks are added (like teams using their own tools at a specific locations/positions).

@LeroyR
Copy link
Member Author

LeroyR commented Mar 18, 2025

Sounds good as long as referees can be sure no hardcoded or scripted tasks are added (like teams using their own tools at a specific locations/positions).

I don't know how to differentiate between any hard coded and open solutions. E.g for door opening: What is the difference between

  1. an omni drive positioning in a predefined relative location to a door (depending on perception) then playing a fixed trajectory
  2. and a robot calculating the trajectory on the fly depending on the perception.

The 2nd may be harder, possibly look cooler but the door is open in both cases. We will not have enough different or any unseen setups to verify.

All objects would be placed by the referee but the plant would still be on the side table and the watering can in the cupboard. I think that should be enough to show perception and planning. We would discuss the value in points depending on novelty, perceived difficulty and usefulness. We can also take team leader votes in consideration.

@sunava
Copy link
Contributor

sunava commented Apr 7, 2025

sounds good! "reasonable household task with funiture within the arena"

  • custom items allowed
  • Opening Discussion: Team Goals & Desired Actions within a team leader meeting

LeroyR added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 14, 2025

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
** Note: Your contribution is expected to meet the conventions and
policies described in the [contribution
guidelines](https://github.com/RoboCupAtHome/RuleBook/wiki/Guidelines:-Contributing)
**

## Description

Closes issue #952

If Teams are able to show other tasks that they think should be included
in egpsr they could bring them up during the Team Leader meetings and
the task score will be decided on-site by the TC. Any used Items must be
provided to all teams.

Example of useful skills not present in the rulebook:

- Cleaning up the windows.
- Finding and cleaning up a spill on the Table.
- Pouring and delivering a drink.
- Water the plants. (The Team provides some watering cans for the Arena)
@LeroyR LeroyR closed this as completed Apr 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants