[CONTENT] Promote Terraform in one reference architecture #764
Conversation
…cture. Also did a test run in one of our global accounts. Took the Terraform scripts from the related DC mission, and used it as a base.
julian-schambeck
requested review from
a team,
cernus76,
jmsrpp and
navyakhurana
as code owners
julian-schambeck
changed the title
|
Preview website is available here. |
1 similar comment
|
Preview website is available here. |
|
@kay-schmitteckert I think you suggested deploying a CAP app as well as part of the Terraform run. To make this work, the person running the script also needs to have MBT, Node, and CAP (cds) installed. Do you think it's worth it? |
cernus76
added
reference-architecture
|
@julian-schambeck, lgtm, so Im okay with what you are starting with - no CAP app necessary for now but if adoption increases, I would think about it again (how can we measure). I just wonder if we want to have the files and documentation as part of AC or there should be dedicated repos for it and just link it. What do you think makes more sense if more and more RAs want to support TF? Thanks! |
|
Ok thanks, got it. The question "how can we measure" is on our radar, because we also need to start tracking if people build on the reference architectures. I think PO wanted to separate code and tooling from content eventually in separate branches or even repositories. That might be a natural point to separate the Terraform files following the same pattern. I would like to avoid repeating the same Terraform section. |
|
Preview website is available here. |
|
Preview website is available here. |
3 participants
What reference architecture does this PR apply to?
RA0005
Who should review your contribution? (Use @mention)
@cernus76 @navyakhurana @kay-schmitteckert
I still need to add resources to main.tf for HANA Cloud and AI Launchpad, but wanted to get your feedback on the Terraform section that I added to the reference architecture.
Checklist before submitting