Skip to content

Conversation

@isidorostsa
Copy link
Contributor

@isidorostsa isidorostsa commented May 16, 2025

This PR is to remove all places in the source code that branch on the existence of stdexec. This PR is auto-generated, so we could apply it at any time. Right now, CI is failing because the builders have not been configured to assume C++20 yet.

@isidorostsa isidorostsa requested a review from hkaiser as a code owner May 16, 2025 17:44
@isidorostsa isidorostsa force-pushed the assume-stdexec-exists branch from 938b9f5 to bc5c496 Compare May 16, 2025 17:48
@isidorostsa
Copy link
Contributor Author

This was done using the unifdef tool (possibly helpful script: https://gist.github.com/isidorostsa/1f334e240279b2664ff37d645f4c145a)

@isidorostsa isidorostsa force-pushed the assume-stdexec-exists branch from bc5c496 to fb679f8 Compare May 16, 2025 17:56
@isidorostsa isidorostsa marked this pull request as draft May 16, 2025 18:04
@codacy-production
Copy link

codacy-production bot commented May 16, 2025

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
Report missing for 24621cb1
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (24621cb) Report Missing Report Missing Report Missing
Head commit (fb679f8) 5656 0 0.00%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#6708) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Footnotes

  1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

@hkaiser hkaiser added the category: senders/receivers Implementations of the p0443r14 / p2300 + p1897 proposals label May 17, 2025
@hkaiser hkaiser added this to the 2.0.0 milestone May 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

category: senders/receivers Implementations of the p0443r14 / p2300 + p1897 proposals

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants