Conversation
…r with compatibility with admin menus, the native Garry's Mod function, and the ability to determine whether or not it is in solo mode.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello,
I think it would be more appropriate to do this in a single SWEP rather than two. Compatibility with all admin systems is much simpler, and I also find it easier to manage the functionality in a single SWEP. Finally, some systems such as SVMOD and VCMOD have already implemented this single SWEP system, so I think it would be more logical to implement the same thing to follow the logic.
Some servers are at the limit of edict. If we add a SWEP, it will add an entity to a player. If there are 20 players with this SWEP, it will add 20 additional entities, which is unnecessary for this type of functionality.