Skip to content

Conversation

@KingaMas
Copy link
Member

@KingaMas KingaMas commented Nov 11, 2025

Pull Request Template

Description

Removed unused requirements file

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • [ x ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed pinned Python package dependencies file from the repository.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 11, 2025

Walkthrough

The requirements/requirements-py310.txt file containing autogenerated pinned Python package versions and their transitive dependencies has been removed. No alternative logic or new functionality is introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Dependency Management
requirements/requirements-py310.txt
File deleted: removed autogenerated pip-compile locked requirements file with pinned package versions and transitive dependency comments

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • Verify the removal is intentional and not accidental
  • Confirm no other parts of the build or CI/CD pipeline depend on this specific file
  • Check if requirements are now consolidated into an alternative file or mechanism

Poem

A file takes flight, no longer bound,
Py310's requirements drift to the ground—
Pinned versions fade like morning mist,
Hop along, there's nothing missed! 🐰✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description is largely incomplete. While it provides a brief summary and marks a change type, it lacks issue reference, testing details, test configuration, reviewers, and most checklist items required by the template. Complete the description by specifying the issue number, adding testing details and configuration, involving relevant reviewers, and addressing the remaining checklist items.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: removal of a duplicate requirements file (requirements-py310.txt), which is directly supported by the raw summary.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bugfix/double_requirements

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fdc0de5 and ddd8af8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • requirements/requirements-py310.txt (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • requirements/requirements-py310.txt
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (11)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.12, macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.13, ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.10, macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.11, macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.12, ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.13, macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.12, windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.10, ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.11, windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.10, windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.11, ubuntu-latest)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.63%. Comparing base (d295fa1) to head (ddd8af8).
⚠️ Report is 46 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #463      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    80.66%   80.63%   -0.04%     
===========================================
  Files           33       33              
  Lines         2871     2871              
===========================================
- Hits          2316     2315       -1     
- Misses         555      556       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@KingaMas KingaMas merged commit 60dc2f7 into develop Nov 11, 2025
16 of 17 checks passed
@KingaMas KingaMas deleted the bugfix/double_requirements branch November 11, 2025 16:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants