Skip to content

Conversation

@WazedKhan
Copy link
Owner

@WazedKhan WazedKhan commented Nov 17, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a new LeetCode solution for identifying the second-largest digit within a string input.
  • Tests

    • Implemented comprehensive test suite covering multiple cases and expected outcomes for the new functionality.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 17, 2025

Walkthrough

A new LeetCode solution is introduced to find the second-largest digit in a string, with a two-variable tracking approach. Test cases are added to validate the solution, and spacing is normalized in existing test tuples.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
New LeetCode Solution
LeetCode/easy/second_largest_digit_in_string_1796.py
Introduces Solution class with secondHighest(s: str) -> int method. Iterates through input string characters, maintains variables for largest and second-largest digits (initialized to -1), updates them when digits are encountered, and returns the second-largest digit (or -1 if unavailable).
Test Suite Updates
tests/test_leetcode_easy.py
Normalizes spacing in existing test tuples. Adds new test function test_second_highest that imports Solution from the new module and runs assertions across multiple test cases with expected outputs.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

  • Verify the digit extraction logic correctly identifies numeric characters
  • Confirm the two-variable tracking accurately updates first and second maximums
  • Validate test cases cover edge cases (no digits, single digit, multiple duplicates)

Poem

🐰 A digit hunt through string so long,
Tracking largest, oh so strong!
Second-best with quiet grace,
Finds its place, leaves nary a trace.
✨ Two variables dance and play,
Second-highest saves the day!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically identifies the LeetCode problem (1796) and the main change being added (Second Largest Digit in a String solution).
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch 1796-second-largest-digit-in-string

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
LeetCode/easy/second_largest_digit_in_string_1796.py (1)

1-12: Algorithm is correct; consider elif for clarity.

The logic correctly tracks the two largest distinct digits. However, the second if at line 10 is effectively mutually exclusive with the first if at line 7 (since after first = d, the condition first > d > second becomes d > d > second, which is always False).

Consider this refactor for clarity:

         if char.isdigit():
             d = int(char)
             if d > first:
                 second = first
                 first = d
-            if first > d > second:
+            elif first > d > second:
                 second = d

This makes the mutual exclusivity explicit and improves readability.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 333142e and 62a86b7.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • LeetCode/easy/second_largest_digit_in_string_1796.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_leetcode_easy.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
tests/test_leetcode_easy.py (2)
LeetCode/easy/second_largest_digit_in_string_1796.py (2)
  • Solution (1-12)
  • secondHighest (2-12)
LeetCode/easy/merge_sorted_array_88.py (1)
  • Solution (6-33)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/test_leetcode_easy.py (2)

8-27: LGTM: Spacing normalization improves consistency.

The spacing adjustments in the test tuples improve readability without changing functionality.


94-116: Excellent test coverage for the second largest digit problem.

The test suite comprehensively covers:

  • Normal cases with multiple unique digits
  • Edge cases (no digits, single unique digit, all same digits)
  • Boundary cases (all digits 0-9, scattered digits)
  • Duplicate handling

The test cases align well with the implementation and should catch potential issues.

@WazedKhan WazedKhan merged commit f62f5ec into main Dec 4, 2025
3 checks passed
@WazedKhan WazedKhan deleted the 1796-second-largest-digit-in-string branch December 4, 2025 02:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants