This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 7, 2020. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
squid:S2259 - Null pointers should not be dereferenced #200
Open
georgekankava
wants to merge
1
commit into
addthis:master
Choose a base branch
from
georgekankava:staging/null-pointers-should-not-be-dereferenced-fix-1
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ public JobTask getTask() { | |
|
|
||
| @Override | ||
| public boolean equals(Object o) { | ||
| if (o.getClass() != getClass()) { | ||
| if (o == null || o.getClass() != getClass()) { | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. A fun alternative here is a humble instanceof call. It'll return false for both nulls and guys two lines away from a class cast exception. One time I checked the jvm bytecode specifically to spite an old professor and at the time at least, it was also several instructions more efficient. |
||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
| JobTaskItem item2 = (JobTaskItem) o; | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
o is guaranteed to be not null, so the extra guard is unnecessary here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe it would be better to split the try block into two. A bit more verbose, but it would be clearer which catch blocks are guarding which line. Something something clarity is great.
It's been an awfully long time, so I suggest closing this PR (with gratitude), and then fixing whatever you want from a cleaner commit.