Skip to content

Bugsink: DOS using large numbers of event tags

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 4, 2026 in bugsink/bugsink • Updated Jun 12, 2026

Package

pip bugsink (pip)

Affected versions

<= 2.2.1

Patched versions

2.2.2

Description

Summary

In affected versions, Bugsink stores every tag supplied with an incoming event. An event with an unusually large number
of custom (i.e. supplied by an attacker) tags can therefore make ingestion spend more time than intended writing tag rows.

Bugsink uses a single-writer database architecture. That keeps the implementation simple, but it also means one
expensive write transaction can delay other event digestion while it is running. In this case, it makes ingestion of
other events wait until the transaction that writes the tags finishes, which effectively causes a temporary denial of
service for other events.

Impact

Submitting such an event requires a valid project DSN. DSNs are sometimes visible in client-side applications, so they
should not be treated as a strong security boundary, but the issue is still limited to ingestion for a Bugsink instance
that accepts the event.

The impact is availability-only. The issue does not expose stored data, modify existing events, or allow code execution.

Mitigation

Update to version 2.2.2, which caps the number of tags stored for a single event. The default cap is 100 tags and can
be changed with MAX_EVENT_TAGS.

References

@vanschelven vanschelven published to bugsink/bugsink Jun 4, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 5, 2026
Reviewed Jun 5, 2026
Last updated Jun 12, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(45th percentile)

Weaknesses

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-53954

GHSA ID

GHSA-5x67-j5xg-c5gj

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.