Skip to content

utcp-gql SSRF: CVE-2026-44661 fix not applied to the GraphQL and WebSocket plugins

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 14, 2026 in universal-tool-calling-protocol/python-utcp • Updated Aug 25, 2026

Package

pip utcp-gql (pip)

Affected versions

<= 1.1.0

Patched versions

1.1.1
pip utcp-websocket (pip)
<= 1.1.0
1.1.1

Description

Summary

The fix for CVE-2026-44661 (commit 5b16e43) added the ensure_secure_url() / is_secure_url() helpers and wired them into the three HTTP-family plugins, but it did not reach the GraphQL or WebSocket plugins. The GraphQL plugin (utcp-gql) still uses the startswith prefix check that the fix explicitly replaced, so http://127.0.0.1.attacker.example and http://localhost.evil.com pass it. The WebSocket plugin (utcp-websocket) performs no URL validation at all, even though its own docstrings state it enforces "WSS or localhost only." Both plugins reach the same SSRF that CVE-2026-44661 was filed for, and because both attach the call template's configured auth headers to the outbound connection, the SSRF can also leak API keys and OAuth tokens to an attacker-controlled host.

Details

In the CVE-2026-44661 fix (commit 5b16e43 ("fix(http): block SSRF via attacker-controlled OpenAPI servers[0].url")), two things in it pointed at sibling issues. The commit message says the change is "replacing the duplicated prefix check", and the new utcp_http/_security.py docstring names the exact bug:

URLs whose hostname starts with localhost / 127.0.0.1 but isn't actually loopback (e.g. http://localhost.evil.com, http://127.0.0.1.attacker.example). The earlier startswith check let these through.

The word "duplicated" says the vulnerable check existed in more than one place. The fix only updated the three HTTP-family plugins (http, streamable_http, sse). The other communication-protocol plugins were also inspected.

GraphQL plugin (utcp-gql). plugins/communication_protocols/gql/src/utcp_gql/gql_communication_protocol.py still has the pre-fix check at line 43:

def _enforce_https_or_localhost(self, url: str) -> None:
    if not (
        url.startswith("https://")
        or url.startswith("http://localhost")
        or url.startswith("http://127.0.0.1")
    ):
        raise ValueError("Security error: URL must use HTTPS or start with ...")

It is called on manual_call_template.url in register_manual (line 102) and on tool_call_template.url in call_tool (line 181). The URL then goes into AIOHTTPTransport(url=...) and a live GraphQL request.

"http://127.0.0.1.attacker.example/graphql".startswith("http://127.0.0.1") is True, so the check passes. If the attacker controls DNS for attacker.example, that hostname resolves to any address they choose, including 169.254.169.254, 127.0.0.1, or an internal 192.168.x.x host, and the GraphQL client sends a plain-HTTP request there. http://localhost.evil.com/graphql behaves the same way. This is the exact prefix bypass CVE-2026-44661 was filed for.

WebSocket plugin (utcp-websocket). plugins/communication_protocols/websocket/src/utcp_websocket/websocket_communication_protocol.py. The module and class docstrings state:

"Security enforcement (WSS or localhost only)"
"Enforces security by requiring WSS or localhost connections"
"Security validation of connection URLs"

There is no such validation in the code. _get_connection(), the only connection path (used by register_manual, call_tool, and call_tool_streaming), calls:

ws = await session.ws_connect(call_template.url, headers=headers, ...)   # line 197

with no scheme or host check. Any URL in a WebSocketCallTemplate connects, including ws://169.254.169.254/, ws://127.0.0.1:<internal-port>/, or any internal hostname.

Credential exposure. Both plugins build connection headers in _prepare_headers(), which attaches the configured auth: ApiKeyAuth as a header, BasicAuth as an Authorization: Basic header, and OAuth2Auth as an Authorization: Bearer token. When the bypass is used to force a plain-HTTP or plain-WS connection to an attacker-resolved host, those credentials are sent to the attacker.

This is the threat model CVE-2026-44661 already established: a UTCP client ingests tool manuals, and a malicious manual is attacker-influenced. The GraphQL and WebSocket plugins consume the same kind of call template, with the same url field, at the same trust level as the HTTP plugins that were fixed.

Affected packages: utcp-gql and utcp-websocket, both at the current release 1.1.0. Neither plugin has been modified since 2025-11-30, so both are unpatched on main.

PoC

The discrepancy is directly observable. With utcp-gql and utcp-http installed:

from utcp_gql.gql_communication_protocol import GraphQLCommunicationProtocol
from utcp_http._security import is_secure_url

bypass = "http://127.0.0.1.attacker.example/graphql"

# The fixed HTTP plugin rejects the bypass URL:
print("utcp_http is_secure_url:", is_secure_url(bypass))   # -> False

# The GraphQL plugin accepts it (no exception is raised):
GraphQLCommunicationProtocol()._enforce_https_or_localhost(bypass)
print("utcp_gql  _enforce_https_or_localhost: ACCEPTED")

End to end: a UTCP client that registers a manual declaring a GraphQL tool with url: "http://127.0.0.1.<attacker-domain>/graphql", where that domain resolves to an internal target, issues the request to that internal service. For WebSocket, a manual declaring a tool with url: "ws://169.254.169.254/" connects with no check at all. To confirm the request lands, point the URL at a listener you control on a host the client can reach but the attacker cannot, or at the client's own loopback.

Impact

Server-Side Request Forgery (CWE-918), the same class and trust boundary as CVE-2026-44661. An attacker who can get a UTCP client to register a malicious manual can:

  • Make the client send GraphQL requests (GraphQL plugin) or open WebSocket connections (WebSocket plugin) to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints it would not otherwise reach.
  • Force plain-HTTP / plain-WS connections to an attacker-resolved host, defeating the "HTTPS or loopback only" guarantee both plugins are meant to provide.
  • Receive the call template's configured credentials (API key, Basic auth, OAuth Bearer token), because those headers are attached to the forged request.

Suggested fix. The correct helper already exists in the codebase. Promote is_secure_url / ensure_secure_url from utcp_http into a shared module (or replicate the urlparse-based hostname logic), then replace _enforce_https_or_localhost in the GraphQL plugin with it, and add an equivalent check in the WebSocket plugin's _get_connection before ws_connect, adapted for the ws and wss schemes. This is the same centralization commit 5b16e43 already applied to the three HTTP plugins; it just needs to cover the remaining two transports.

Patched

  • utcp-gql 1.1.1 replaces the broken _enforce_https_or_localhost
    prefix check with hostname-based ensure_secure_url, applied at
    both register_manual and call_tool. The underlying aiohttp
    session is also patched after connect() to refuse 3xx responses,
    closing the post-validation redirect SSRF on the GraphQL endpoint.
  • utcp-websocket 1.1.1 introduces ensure_secure_ws_url (the
    WebSocket-scheme companion of ensure_secure_url) and enforces it
    in both the WebSocketCallTemplate Pydantic field validator and
    _get_connection. ws_connect is called with allow_redirects=False.
    The OAuth2 token-fetch path uses the same redirect-safe helper
    introduced in utcp-http 1.1.4.

Both plugins duplicate _security.py from utcp-http (rather than
adding a cross-plugin runtime dependency); keep the copies in sync
when changing validator behaviour.

Upgrade to utcp-gql >= 1.1.1 and/or utcp-websocket >= 1.1.1. No
workaround in earlier versions.

References

Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 25, 2026
Reviewed Aug 25, 2026
Last updated Aug 25, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(13th percentile)

Weaknesses

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-12210

GHSA ID

GHSA-ppx3-28rw-8fpf

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.