Bitwise math #106
Open
Bitwise math #106
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Bumping version number and fixing the attempts to destructure a record constructor without using named fields as noted in the v1.1.11 release. |
added 5 commits
February 18, 2025 20:59
|
I made a branch with the same name. Check out if you like the interface there #107 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Start of the bit wise math implementation for byte arrays. This will need some work to really nail this down properly in terms of speed and correctness.
Best case: Be feature complete for arbitrary arithmetic using the ByteArray type.
Optimal case: Implement the easy ones like pow_2 and modulo arithmetic.
I will implement some padding helper functions in case we want to provide this then the math can default to modulo arithmetic but allows users to have arbitrary precision if required.