Skip to content

chore: drop unused strata-test-utils-btcio crate - #2391

Open
prajwolrg wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/drop-test-utils-btcio
Open

prajwolrg wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/drop-test-utils-btcio

Conversation

@prajwolrg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Removes the local strata-test-utils-btcio crate. Nothing in this workspace depends on it. The crate is maintained and used in alpenlabs/asm, and that copy stays in Cargo.lock as a transitive dependency.

The corepc-node workspace dependency is removed too, since this crate was its only user here. The bitreq profile override stays because bitcoind-async-client still pulls in bitreq.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature/Enhancement (non-breaking change which adds functionality or enhances an existing one)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update
  • Refactor
  • New or updated tests
  • Dependency Update

Notes to Reviewers

Is this PR addressing any specification, design doc or external reference document?

  • Yes
  • No

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • I have commented my code where necessary.
  • I have updated the documentation if needed.
  • My changes do not introduce new warnings.
  • I have added (where necessary) tests that prove my changes are effective or that my feature works.
  • New and existing tests pass with my changes.
  • I have disclosed my use of AI in the body of this PR.

AI use: Claude Code found the references, made the removal, and wrote this description.

Related Issues

None.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

No crate in this workspace depends on it. The copy that is used lives in
alpenlabs/asm. The corepc-node workspace dep goes with it, since it had no
other user here.
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Commit: ad4ac84

SP1 Execution Results

program cycles gas
Checkpoint 2,782,155 3,212,830

@prajwolrg
prajwolrg marked this pull request as ready for review October 12, 2026 07:01
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ⚠️ Failed 2026-10-12T07:02:50.168896Z c4f4ffb Draft marked ready
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-12T07:05:57.894101Z c4f4ffb Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔒 AI Security Review (claude-opus-5-5)

✅ No security issues found.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.15%. Comparing base (3f737b5) to head (c4f4ffb).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2391      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.05%   89.15%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         443      434       -9     
  Lines       75766    75331     -435     
==========================================
- Hits        67477    67163     -314     
+ Misses       8289     8168     -121     
Flag Coverage Δ
functional 58.75% <ø> (-0.10%) ⬇️
unit 81.76% <ø> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 6 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@storopoli storopoli left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🪨 blocking this until we have #2385 merged to see if any Cargo.lock changes breaks the VK. I don't want #2380 again.

@prajwolrg
prajwolrg requested a review from storopoli October 15, 2026 06:19
@storopoli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@prajwolrg please rebase?

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants