You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Firstly, I really like the idea behind the manuscript, particularly the HLEP/HLDP formula.
I'm currently trying to replicate it for some other analyses, and I noticed that for this part:
We first counted the number of predicted ligands Ni of length l coming from protein i. The average number of presented ligands for each HLA allele was computed as <ρ = /<Li, where Li = length of protein – l is the corrected protein length and <·> denotes the average over the proteome.
zero counts for a protein were not included? Is there a particular reason for this?
I do notice you include a pseudocount in the actual code (to circumvent zero counts?):
Hi,
Firstly, I really like the idea behind the manuscript, particularly the HLEP/HLDP formula.
I'm currently trying to replicate it for some other analyses, and I noticed that for this part:
zero counts for a protein were not included? Is there a particular reason for this?
I do notice you include a pseudocount in the actual code (to circumvent zero counts?):
However, there are no zero counts in the data provided?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: