Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Make codecov badge green in README #795

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 29, 2025
Merged

Conversation

MaxymVlasov
Copy link
Collaborator

@MaxymVlasov MaxymVlasov commented Jan 29, 2025

Description of your changes

We already know that there will be no 100% because of how it interprets MyPy checks, even if they're 100% actually.
Also, I found that there was an attempt to set up badge only for pytest, but the option was specified wrong, so I fixed that.
https://docs.codecov.com/docs/status-badges

image

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated Codecov badge and reference URLs in README
    • Modified URL parameter from flags[] to flag for Codecov links

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request involves updating the Codecov badge URLs in the README.md file. The changes modify the URL query parameter from flags[] to flag, which appears to be a syntax adjustment for the Codecov badge and reference links. This update does not change the functionality of the README but ensures the correct URL format for displaying code coverage information.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Updated Codecov badge URLs from flags[] to flag parameter

Possibly related PRs

  • chore: Add OSSF badge #787: The changes in this PR also involve modifications to the README.md file, specifically related to the addition of a new badge, which indicates a direct connection in terms of updates made to the same file.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 83fbc6b and 92d09ec.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: 🧪 Tests / pytest@🐍3.9@macos-13
  • GitHub Check: 🧪 Tests / pytest@🐍3.12@macos-14
  • GitHub Check: 🧪 Tests / pytest@🐍3.11@macos-14
  • GitHub Check: 🧪 Tests / pytest@🐍3.10@macos-14
  • GitHub Check: 🧪 Tests / pytest@🐍3.10@macos-13

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@MaxymVlasov MaxymVlasov marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2025 14:43
@webknjaz
Copy link
Contributor

interprets MyPy checks, even if they're 100% actually.

It's actually incorrect. If MyPy-flagged report was 100%, it would've been merged correctly. But MyPy just can't be at 100% rn.

Co-authored-by: 🇺🇦 Sviatoslav Sydorenko (Святослав Сидоренко) <[email protected]>
@MaxymVlasov MaxymVlasov merged commit 4b0ad90 into master Jan 29, 2025
68 checks passed
@MaxymVlasov MaxymVlasov deleted the MaxymVlasov-patch-2 branch January 29, 2025 19:02
@antonbabenko
Copy link
Owner

This PR is included in version 1.97.1 🎉

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 8, 2025
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants