Skip to content

Add ExecutionFlags to support replay#12013

Open
apfitzge wants to merge 4 commits intoanza-xyz:masterfrom
apfitzge:consumer_flags
Open

Add ExecutionFlags to support replay#12013
apfitzge wants to merge 4 commits intoanza-xyz:masterfrom
apfitzge:consumer_flags

Conversation

@apfitzge
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Problem

  • Want to re-use same consumer (and external message types) for replay stage

Summary of Changes

  • Add ExecutionFlags to:
    • skip account locking: not strictly necessary, but since we do not need to worry about a jito thread in replay, this is useful to avoid overhead
    • skip cost tracking: skip cost tracking in the workers; scheduler can track this w/o lock-contention
    • skip poh recording: skip poh recording since that is not relevant to replay
  • Add plumbing to support vote sender w/ unverified transactions
    • in replay signatures are verified asynchronously

Fixes #

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Apr 17, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 96.83099% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 83.2%. Comparing base (8ce2812) to head (ac69338).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #12013     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage    83.2%    83.2%   -0.1%     
=========================================
  Files         860      860             
  Lines      321533   321747    +214     
=========================================
+ Hits       267752   267905    +153     
- Misses      53781    53842     +61     
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@apfitzge apfitzge marked this pull request as ready for review April 17, 2026 14:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants