Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split next_dagruns_to_examine function into two #42386

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 24, 2024

Conversation

dstandish
Copy link
Contributor

The behavior is different enough to merit two different functions. In fact I noticed that we actually are using a bad index hint for the QUEUED case. And this becomes more apparent with introduction of backfill handling into scheduler, which is forthcoming.

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added the area:Scheduler including HA (high availability) scheduler label Sep 20, 2024
The behavior is different enough to merit two different functions.  In fact I noticed that we actually are using a bad index hint for the QUEUED case. And this becomes more apparent with introduction of backfill handling into scheduler, which is forthcoming.
@dstandish dstandish force-pushed the split-next-dagruns-to-examine-func branch from 06b2f2b to c831b5c Compare September 20, 2024 21:48
airflow/models/dagrun.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@dstandish dstandish merged commit 9ec8753 into apache:main Sep 24, 2024
50 checks passed
@dstandish dstandish deleted the split-next-dagruns-to-examine-func branch September 24, 2024 17:30
joaopamaral pushed a commit to joaopamaral/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
The behavior is different enough to merit two different functions.  In fact I noticed that we actually are using a bad index hint for the QUEUED case. And this becomes more apparent with introduction of backfill handling into scheduler, which is forthcoming.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:Scheduler including HA (high availability) scheduler
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants