-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Shared Filesystem as a First Class Feature #9208
Conversation
…FsVmFileShareProvider
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9208 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 15.57% 15.64% +0.06%
- Complexity 12056 12110 +54
============================================
Files 5506 5535 +29
Lines 482997 485033 +2036
Branches 59483 62628 +3145
============================================
+ Hits 75236 75887 +651
- Misses 399450 400773 +1323
- Partials 8311 8373 +62
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@blueorangutan package |
@abh1sar a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10985 |
@blueorangutan test matrix |
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (EL8 mgmt + EL8 KVM, Ubuntu22 mgmt + Ubuntu22 KVM, EL8 mgmt + VMware 7.0u3, EL9 mgmt + XCP-ng 8.2 ) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-11358) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, the test failures does not seem related.
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch. |
@blueorangutan package |
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch. |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10994 |
@blueorangutan test |
@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
Merging this based on previous test runs and code review, will do another round of review after merging this. |
INDEX `i_shared_filesystem__domain_id`(`domain_id`) | ||
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; | ||
|
||
DROP VIEW IF EXISTS `cloud`.`user_vm_view`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if we need this here as well as it's already added in the respective view file: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/9208/files#diff-a5be1b062185fbc803c3f9a03ab8aab590b475a8cafbd46760607a7a071ea606R28
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this is not required. Will remove it in a separate PR.
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-11372)
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-11373)
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-11371)
|
) This PR implements Storage filesystem as a first class feature. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Storage+Filesystem+as+a+First+Class+Feature Documentation PR: apache/cloudstack-documentation#420 Co-authored-by: Wei Zhou <[email protected]>
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-11370)
|
Description
This PR implements Storage filesystem as a first class feature.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Storage+Filesystem+as+a+First+Class+Feature
Documentation PR: apache/cloudstack-documentation#420
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?