Skip to content

Conversation

@steveloughran
Copy link
Contributor

@steveloughran steveloughran commented Sep 9, 2024

Not for merging

Feature

Outline of a RenameOperation class which creates a builder which would ultimately initiate a rename.

It's not that complex an operation API-wise.
The pain will be in implementing it consistently, especially if we make that non-posix rename into empty dir feature optional with an withLegacyPathFixup() flag.

HDFS would need to implement this server side.
Without that, it could be done for hdfs on the client.

ABFS and S3A could both benefit

Change-Id: I030842543dc60cb4cba3716a6f9d87dd986dffc0
ABFS: etag/file status for better file rename, saved HEAD
S3A: save on HEAD/LIST, progress callbacks (hello distCp!),

How was this patch tested?

wasn't

For code changes:

  • Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
  • Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

Outline of a RenameOperation class which creates a builder which would
ultimately initiate a rename.

It's not *that* complex an operation API-wise.
The pain will be in implementing it consistently, especially if we make that
non-posix rename into empty dir feature optional with an withLegacyPathFixup()
flag.

HDFS would need to implement this server side.
Without that, it could be done for hdfs on the client.

ABFS and S3A could both benefit

Change-Id: I030842543dc60cb4cba3716a6f9d87dd986dffc0
ABFS: etag/file status for better file rename, saved HEAD
S3A: save on HEAD/LIST, progress callbacks (hello distCp!),
@steveloughran steveloughran marked this pull request as draft September 9, 2024 16:17
@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 17m 55s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 0s detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 51m 31s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 19m 47s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04
+1 💚 compile 18m 6s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 19s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 1m 45s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 17s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 54s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
+1 💚 spotbugs 2m 41s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 41m 50s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 0m 59s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 18m 43s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04
+1 💚 javac 18m 43s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 17m 57s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
+1 💚 javac 17m 57s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
-0 ⚠️ checkstyle 1m 16s /results-checkstyle-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-common.txt hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common: The patch generated 4 new + 16 unchanged - 0 fixed = 20 total (was 16)
+1 💚 mvnsite 1m 42s the patch passed
-1 ❌ javadoc 1m 14s /patch-javadoc-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-common-jdkUbuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04.txt hadoop-common in the patch failed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 54s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
-1 ❌ spotbugs 2m 51s /new-spotbugs-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-common.html hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common generated 1 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0)
+1 💚 shadedclient 41m 56s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 19m 41s hadoop-common in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 1m 3s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
266m 6s
Reason Tests
SpotBugs module:hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common
Unread field:FutureRenameOutcomeBuilderImpl.java:[line 60]
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.46 ServerAPI=1.46 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7033/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #7033
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname Linux 04d5798cfed9 5.15.0-117-generic #127-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 5 20:13:28 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / dabb742
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.24+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu320.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_422-8u422-b05-1~20.04-b05
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7033/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 3137 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common U: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7033/1/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the stale tag and review again.
Thanks all for your contribution.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Sep 21, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Sep 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants